Keywords
psychology
Publications
Semenov I.N. (2018). А.N. Leontiev contribution in the development of psychology of thinking, engineering psychology and ergonomics. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 3, 3-20
Relevance. Scientific and scientific-organizational activity of a world-famous psychologist A.N. Leontiev is a constant interest of specialists in the field of humanistics, methodologists and historians of psychology. In connection with the 115th anniversary of this outstanding scientist, it seems relevant to remind readers of the poorly studied aspects of his life creation.
Objective. Description of contribution А.N. Leontiev in the development of engineering-psychological, ergonomic and reflexive-acmeological problems in the 1950-1970's.
Methods. Science-research analysis (from the positions of reflexive psychology and personology), and methodological analysis.
Results. The author analyzes such aspects of the scientific heritage of A.N. Leontiev, as his fundamental research of productive thinking and scientific creativity, as well as applied developments in the field of engineering psychology and ergonomics. The fundamental contribution of the scientist to modern human studies and to the institutional construction of psychological science is shown.
Conclusions. Scientific creativity of A.N. Leontiev in the field of psychology is interdisciplinary in nature, because it synthesizes the methodological orientations of modern humanities - natural science, technology cybernetic, social and humanitarian. The crown of the enormous scientific and organizational activity of A.N. Leontiev became a large-scale institutionalization of Russian psychology, which demanded from him not less vision and intuition, intelligence and will, diplomacy and energy than his outstanding creative activity in the field of philosophy, psychology, ergonomics and pedagogy.
Received: 06/20/2018
Accepted: 07/04/2018
Pages: 3-20
DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2018.03.03
Keywords: A.N. Leontiev;
personology;
psychology;
philosophy;
methodology;
activity;
thinking;
ergonomics;
science-research analysis;
Available Online: 09/07/2018
Leonova A.B., Noskova O.G.(2015). Ideals of psychological science and practice in prof. E.A. Klimov works . Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 4, 4-14
The paper is devoted to the overview of the creative heritage of prof. E.A. Klimov (1930—2014) in relation to his 85th anniversary of the birth. There are described the main topics of his research; the proposed by him understanding the essence of psychology in the framework of modern issues on “science of sciences”; the role of systemic methodology in psychological researches, the main problems of teaching on psychology at universities; a specificity of practitioners’ thinking in comparison with a theoretical thinking; depicting the psychological qualities of psychologists as professionals. Special attention is paid to his outlooks on the history of psychology, to the relations between scientific and everyday comprehension of psychology, and to a responsibility of the scientific psychology to a society and a practice.
Received: 08/02/2015
Pages: 4-14
DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2015.04.04
Keywords: psychology;
psychology of labour;
creative heritage of prof. E.A. Klimov;
systemic methodology of research;
teaching on psychology;
psychologist as a professional;
the responsibility of scientific psychology;
Available Online: 12/31/2015
Kravkov S.V.(2015).Excerpts from the book S.V. Kravkov “Self-observation”. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 3, 57-64
Excerpts from the book S.V. Kravkov “Self-observation” (Moscow: Russkiy knizhnik, 1922. 176 p.). In his study, S.V. Kravkov presents arguments in favor of the need for introspection, psychology, introspection separates from reflection, analyzes the mental processes that provide the opportunity to introspection introspective discusses ways of organizing research and other theoretical methodological issues arising in connection with introspection.
Received: 02/07/2015
Pages: 57-64
DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2015.03.57
Keywords: self-observation;
introspection;
psychology;
experience;
attention;
memory;
intention;
Available Online: 09/30/2015
Semenov I.N.(2015). The reflexivity of self-observation and personology of introspection: To ontology and methodology of ref lexive psychology of personality. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 3, 22-39
First part of the article analyzes the historical and scientific, etymological and methodological problems of psycho-reflexivity personology study self-perception and self-observation – through introspection – a man’s own Self as an integrated personality and social personality. Considered external opposition, socio-objective determination of human mental activity and its internal, reflexive sense of life, the source of which is the individual amateur I. From these positions explicated logic of perceptual psychology: the study of perception through introspection objectivity to subjectivity reflection reflexive self-perpetuating I proposed ontology of psychological reality of the inner life, where its components are incorporated such as: self-actualization, self-perception, self-knowledge, self-understanding, self-awareness, self-determination, selfactualization personality I. In the context of reflexive psychology, personology considered reflexive nature of introspection problem-conflict situations in the self-identity sphere of artistic and scientific creativity. In the second part of the article the proposed theoretical propositions are realized on empirical material reflexive psychological analysis of introspective self-life-creativity outstanding writer and thinker M.M. Zoshchenko. Given held them all his life a dramatic existential introspection M.M. Zoshchenko and corrected to reflect the semantic field of their identity, which was reflected in the development of introspective style as his artistic creativity, and social behavior of the individual. In conclusion, characterized the role of reflective dialogue as a means of enhancing introspective self-perception and self-identity I am human.
Pages: 22-39
DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2015.03.22
Keywords: psychology;
methodology;
ontology;
personology;
personality;
behavior;
activity;
consciousness;
introspection;
reflection;
cognition;
perception;
self-perception;
self-observation;
sense;
understanding;
self-development;
self-concept;
professional self-concept;
subjectivity;
life-creativity;
Available Online: 09/30/2015
Shabelnikov V.K. (2012). Mental actions formation: Mysteries puzzled out and not. The Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 4, 53-72
The method of intelligent processes formation by P.Ya. Galperin takes as principal a depiction of structure of activity hidden from sense but existing as objective reality. A problem of logic bases and sources as well as of the structure of mental actions is point at issue of the article. Compared are the of the philosophers’ views (Plato, Aristotle, Meister Eckhart, Hegel) and of psychologist’s (J. Piaget, L. Vygotsky, A.N. Leontiev) on the grounds of mental structures determination. Unsolved problems of mental actions determination are emphasized.
Pages: 53-72
Keywords: mental action;
activity;
subject;
formation;
structure;
logic bases;
psychology;
culture;
Available Online: 12/30/2012
Feldshtein D.I.(2008). About the state of the art and the ways to increase the quality of the dissertations in psychology and pedagogics. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin,1,3-12
The article is devoted to the problem of increasing of scientific standards and applied value of dissertations in pedagogics and psychology. Significant growth of quantity of dissertations in psychological and padagogical specialities is mentioned, and the reasons for the growth are pointed out. The indications of decreasing of dissertations’ scientific standards are listed with supporting factual data and typical examples. Some prompt actions undertaking for increasing the scientific standards and applied value of dissertations in pedagogics and psychology are described.
Zinchenko Yu.P., Stepanova M.A. (2008).Work of dissertation councils at the MSU Department of Psychology. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin,1,13-21
The article presents the analysis of work of dissertation councils at the MSU Department of Psychology. Quantitative indexes of defend thesises in psychology and pedagogic are adduced for 2001–2007 years. It was made an attempt to assume the quality of defended thesises in psychological and pedagogical science, as the priority was set the task to increase heir level, in particular, due to high requirements to publications in scientific edition «Moscow University Bulletin (Vestnik). Seria 14. Psychology».
Zinchenko Yu.P.(2007).Professional psychologies — for the future of Russia. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin,3,7-14
Professional psychologies — for the future of Russia.