Lomonosov Psychology Journal
ISSN 0137-0936
eISSN 2309-9852
En Ru
ISSN 0137-0936
eISSN 2309-9852

Keywords

MainKeywords

computer psychological testing

Publications

Filter
En:
DOI:
  

Shmelyov A.G., Lisitza I.A. (2016). Computer testing and gamification: the perspectives of monitoring of the functional states of the personnel in the era of computerization of psychodiagnostics. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 4, 98-109

This short article discusses innovations in training and personnel assessment associated with the implementation of gamification of computer tools for learning and assessing (psycho-diagnostics). In the theoretical part of the article the authors give an operational definition of the term “gamification”, and also discussed factors that impede successful gamification — reduces the validity of computer psycho-diagnostic methods based on the use of game elements. In an experimental-methodological part of the article describes a new brief, threeminute computer technique for the estimation of a functional state called “The spoons”. This technique is a game modification of the classic “proof-reading test”. The authors publish data on a sufficiently high reliability and validity of the new method, confirming the possibility of its use as a tool for monitoring (operational security) functional status.

Received: 11/29/2016

Accepted: 12/15/2016

Pages: 98-109

DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2016.04.98

Keywords: personnel assessment; computer psychological testing; gamification; mental capacity; functional state; proof-reading test; account of visual objects;

By: ; ;

Available Online: 12/30/2016

Naumenko A.S., Shmelyov A.G.(2008).Test interpretation form as a factor influencing organizational efficiency of test results. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin,3,107-123

The paper analyzes influence of different forms of test interpretation on the decision-making among HR specialists. The empirical results did not confirm most of the “simple” hypotheses initially formulated by the authors, and some more complicated patterns were derived. The main factors influencing perception and use of test results were as follows: the conditions and circumstances of the decision making process, the value of test results for the decision making, and the individual differences between HR specialists who analyzed test results. On the basis of acquired empirical results some new experimental hypotheses and ideas of prospective studies were formulated.

Received: 12/06/2007

Pages: 107-123

Keywords: test interpretation; numerical scale profiles; narrative reports; computer psychological testing; personnel selection; efficiency of personnel testing;

By: ;

Available Online: 09/30/2008