Article
Vasilieva I.I. (2016). The methodological meaning of the concept “ergatic system”. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2, 36-45
Abstract
The step-by-step concretization of a basic abstract system S–O has been done in the article. The main phenomena of team labor were identified through this process and basic forms of team work integration such as organization culture, exchange relationships, procedural and distributive justices as well as integration by labor objects were disclosed. The full range of ergatic systems’ forms was exposed as result of concept modeling. The ergatic system model has shown sufficient logical base for integration of subjects of ergonomics and organizational psychology. It also demonstrates the full opportunities of activity approach as general theory for wide scope of humanitarian sciences.
Sections: Theoretical studies;
Pages: 36-45DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2016.02.36
Keywords: subject; object; activity approach; splitted subject; integration of the splitted subject; human-machine system; organizational culture; exchange relationships; team fairness;
Available Online 20.09.2016
References:
Argyris, C. (1957) The individual and organization: Some problems of mutual adjustment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 1, 1—24.
Blau, P.M. (1964) Exchange and power in social life. N.Y.: Wiley.
Borodkin, F.M., Koryak, N.M. (1989) Vnimanie: konflikt! [Attention: conflict!] Novosibirsk: Nauka. Sibirskoe otdelenie.
Danakin, N.S. (2014) Gruppovoe vliyanie na organizatsionnoe povedenie [Group influence on organizational behavior]. Belgorod: Belgorodskiy gos. tekhnologicheskiy un-t im. V.G. Shukhova.
Denison, D.R., Neale, W. (1996) Denison organizational culture survey. Facilitator guide. Ann Arbor, MI: Aviat.
Dobrzyński, M. (1981) Klimat organizacyjny jako regulator zachowania się ludzi // Organizacja i kierowanie [Organization and management], 1, 13—27.
Homans, G.C. (1958) Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 6, 597—606.
Kameron, K.S., Kuinn, R.E. (2001) Diagnostika i izmenenie organizatsionnoy kul'tury [Diagnosing and changing organizational culture]. S.-Petersburg: Piter.
Klimov, E.A. (2003) O nekotorykh trebovaniyakh k gruppovomu sub"ektu truda. Akmeologiya [Acmeology], 2, 93—101.
Leventhal, G.S. (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationship. In K.J. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg, R.H. Willis (eds.) Social exchange: advances in theory and research (pp. 27—55). N.Y.: Plenum Press.
Malinowski, B. (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mayo, E. (1933) The human problems of an industrial civilization. N.Y.: MacMillan.
Prigozhin, A.I. (1980) Sotsiologiya organizatsiy [Sociology of organizations]. Moscow: Nauka.
Schein, E. Culture, leadership & humble inquiry. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MwebWXtKBs (Date of access:11.02.2016).
Schein, E. (2002) Organizatsionnaya kul'tura i liderstvo [Organizational culture and leadership]. S.-Petersburg: Piter.
Shtroo, V.A., Petrova, E.S. (2008) Gruppovoy mif i tselostnost' organizatsii. Prikladnaya yuridicheskaya psikhologiya [Applied legal psychology], 2, 6—19.
Terner, Dzh. (1985) Karl Marks i dialekticheskaya teoriya konflikta. In Terner Dzh. Struktura sotsiologicheskoy teorii (pp. 127—130). Moscow: Progress.
Vasil'eva, I.I. (2016) Ob ob"ektnoy determinatsii organizatsionnoy kul'tury [Elektronnyy resurs]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational psychology], 6, 3, 8—21. URL: http://orgpsyjournal.hse.ru (Date of access: 11.10.2016).
Vasil'eva, I.I. (2014) Predotvrashchenie emotsional'nykh konfliktov kak zadacha inzhenerno-psikhologicheskogo proektirovaniya. In A.A. Oboznov, A.L. Zhuravlev (eds.) Aktual'nye problemy psikhologii truda, inzhenernoy psikhologii i ergonomiki [Actual problems of psychology of labor, engineering psychology and ergonomics] (pp. 161—171). Moscow: Izd-vo IP RAN.
Vasiljeva, I.I., Zhuravljov, G.E. (1993) Dependencies and exchanges in an industrial team. In S.V. Malakhov (ed.) Economic psychology and behavioral economics: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Colloquium of IAREP (pp. 376—383). Rotterdam: Erasmus University, 1993.
Veber, M. Khozyaystvo i obshchestvo [Economy and society] [Elektronnyy resurs]. URL: http://filosof. historic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000306 (Date of access: 01.09.2016).
Yudin, B.G. (1969) Protsessy samoorganizatsii v malykh gruppakh. Sistemnye issledovaniya. Ezhegodnik [System studies. Yearbook] (pp. 193—201). Moscow: Nauka.
Zhuravlev A.L. Psikhologicheskie osobennosti kollektivnogo sub"ekta // Problema sub"ekta v psikhologicheskoy nauke / Pod red. A.V. Brushlinskogo, M.I. Volovikovoy, V.N. Druzhinina. Moscow: Akademicheskiy proekt, 2000. S. 133—150.
Zhuravlev, A.L., Kupreychenko, A.B. (2004—2005) Problemy ekonomicheskoy psikhologii v 2 t. [Problems of economic psychology in 2 volumes] Moscow: Izd-vo IP RAN.
Zhuravlev, G.E. (1985) Morfologicheskie i funktsional'nye aspekty struktur otnosheniy v proizvodstvennom kollektive. In E.V. Shorokhova, V.P. Levkovich (eds.) Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvennaya praktika [Social psychology and social practice] (pp. 38—49). Moscow: Nauka.
Zankovskiy, A.N. (2002) Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya [Organizational psychology]. Moscow: Flinta; MPSI.
For citing this article:
Vasilieva I.I. (2016). The methodological meaning of the concept “ergatic system”. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2, 36-45
