Lomonosov Psychology Journal
ISSN 0137-0936
eISSN 2309-9852
En Ru
ISSN 0137-0936
eISSN 2309-9852

Change Response Styles and Teachers' Perceptions of Organizational Culture and Conflicts in the School

 

Backstage. There is a shortage of socio-psychological research devoted to the systematic consideration of the problem of teachers' attitude to changes in modern schools at three levels: organizational, interpersonal and individual-personal.

Objective of the study is to identify the interrelationships of change response styles with teachers' perception of organizational culture and conflicts in the school.

Methods. A questionnaire survey was conducted in a remote format using an online platform. Used: the questionnaire "Change response styles", "Methods of diagnosing the organizational culture of the school", the method "Conflicts in the educational environment".

Sample. The study involved 66 teachers of senior classes of secondary schools and lyceums in several regions of Russia (Zarechny city, Penzenskaya oblast; Lesnoy city Sverdlovskaya oblast; Novouralsk, Sverdlovskaya oblast).

Results. Teachers with a conservative change response style prefer a traditional stable environment and are focused on a resultive organizational culture of the school; they estimate the frequency of conflicts between teachers and pupils at school with the involvement of parents lower. Teachers with an innovative response style strive for constant progress and innovation and are guided by the innovative culture of the school; a positive correlation was revealed with the assessment of the frequency of conflicts between teacher and pupil with the participation of a parent. Teachers who are representatives of the reactive change response style have a hard time adapting to any type of change, prefer the role culture of the school; there is a positive relationship with the degree of emotional discomfort caused by several types of conflicts involving the teacher. Teachers with a realizing response style flexibly adapt to various changes and prefer innovative and family types of school culture; they have a negative relationship with emotional discomfort from conflicts involving the teacher.

Conclusion. The results obtained allow us to determine the perspective of further steps of the author's team, which consists in building a three–way model of the educational space "school ― pupil ― family" with the inherent properties of a systemic self-developing object.


References

1.     Aksenova, E.P. (2012). An ipsative approach to personality assessment: opportunities and limitations. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya (Psychological Research), 5, 24, 10. Retrieved from: http://psystudy.ru (review date: 31.03.2022). (In Russ.).

2.     Antsupov, A.Ya., Shipilov A.I. (2020). Conflictology: Textbook for universities. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.).

3.     Andreeva, G.M. (2007). Psychology of social cognition. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russ.).

4.     Andreeva, G.M. (2017). Social psychology. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russ.).

5.     Bagrova, N.V. (2017). Actual Problems of Russian Education: Ways of Their Solution and Modernization of Education. Contemporary Problems of Social Work, 3 (4), 12.

6.     Bazarov, T.Yu., Sycheva M.P. (2012). Development and approbation of Change Response Styles Questionnaire. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya (Questions of psychology), 5 (25), 12-22. (In Russ.).

7.     Belinskaya, E.P., Tikhomandritskaya O.A. (2013). Problems of socialization: history and modernity. Moscow: MPSU; Voronezh: MODEK. (In Russ.).

8.     Berkemeyer, N., Junker, R., Bos, W., Muthing, K. (2015). Organizational cultures in education: Theory-based use of an instrument for identifying school culture. Journal for Educational Research Online, 7 (3), 86–102.

9.     Bityutskaya, E.V., Bazarov, T.Yu. (2019). Features of the perception of life events by people with different preferred styles of responding to changes. Voprosy psihologii (Voprosy psihologii), 3, 94–106. (In Russ.).

10. Briggs, K., Cheney, G.R., Davis, J., Moll, K.A. (2013). Operating in the dark: What outdated state policies and data gaps mean for effective school leadership. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED560209.pdf (review date: 31.03.2022).

11. Bubnova, I.S., Arganova, A.N. (2013). School mediation as a technology for resolving conflicts among adolescents. Psihologiya v ekonomike i upravlenii (Psychology in Economics and Management), 2, 90–93. (In Russ.).

12. Bush, T. (2015). Organization theory in education: How does it inform school leadership? Journal of Organizational Theory in Education, 1, 35–47.

13. Cameron, K., Quinn, R. (2001). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture. In I.V. Andreeva (Eds.). St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.).

14. Cobb N. (2014). Climate, culture and collaboration: The key to creating safe and supportive schools. Techniques: Connecting Education & Careers, 89 (7), 14–19.

15. Daud, Y., Raman A., Don, Y., Sofian, M., Hussin F. (2015). The type of culture at a high performance schools and low performance school in the State of Kedah. International Education Studies, 8 (2), 21–31.

16. Debski, M., Cieciora, M., Pietrzak, P., Bolkunow, W. (2020). Organizational culture in public and non-public higher education institutions in Poland: A study based on Cameron and Quinn’s model. Human Systems Management, 39 (1), 1–11.

17. Dogani, B. (2018). School culture and climate, factors for an effective school. Knowledge International Journal, 28 (3), 757–760.

18. Dubovskaya, E.M. (2014). The transitivity of society as a factor in the socialization of the individual. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya (Psychological Research), 7, 36, 7. (Retrieved from: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2014v7n36/1018-dubovskaya36.html (review date: 28.03.2022) (In Russ.).

19. Golynchik, E.O., Eleferenko, D.P., Lipatov, S.A., Nesmeyanova, R.K. (2020). perception by students and teachers of conflict situations that arise between them in the educational environment. Chelovecheskij kapital (Human capital), 12 (144), 223–236. (In Russ.).

20. Grishina, N.V. (2016). Psychology of conflict. St. Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.).

21. Hasan, B.I. (2002). The nature and mechanisms of conflict phobia. Conflictology: Reader. In N.I. Leonov, (Eds.). Moscow: Moskovskij psihologo-social'nyj institut; Voronezh: NPO Modek. (In Russ.).

22. Ivanov, A.E. (2014). New approaches to the development of ipsative psychodiagnostic methods. Vestnik YuUrGu. Seriya Psihologiya (Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series Psychology), 7(4), 89–96. (In Russ.).

23. Jaghargh, F.Z., Ghorbanpanah, H., Nabavi, S.E., Saboordavoodian A., Farvardin Z. (2012). A Survey on Organizational Culture Based on Stephan Robbins's Theory (Case Study). 2-nd International Conference on Management and Artificial Intelligence, IPEDR, 35, 5.

24. Kythreotis, A., Pashiardis, P., Kyriakides, L. (2010). The influence of school leadership styles and culture on students’ achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 48 (2), 218–240.

25. Konovalov, A. (2014). School Reconciliation Service and Restorative Relationship Culture: A Practical Guide. In L.M. Karnozova (Eds.). Moscow: Centr Sudebno-pravovaya reforma. (In Russ.).

26. Kozer, L. (2000). Functions of social conflict. Moscow: Ideya-Press. Dom intellektual'noj knigi. (In Russ.).

27. Krichevskii, R.L., Dubovskaya, E.M. (2001). Social psychology of a small group. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russ.).

28. Lewis, D. (2002). Five years on ― the organizational culture saga revisited. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 23, 280–287.

29. Lipatov, S.A. (1997). Organizational culture: conceptual models and diagnostic methods. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14, Psihologiya (The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology), 4, 55–65. (In Russ.).

30. Maksudov, R. (2009). Building trust: what school reconciliation services can do for Russia. School Reconciliation Services. Russian model of school mediation. Moscow: Centr «Sudebno-pravovaya reforma», 8–26. (In Russ.).

31. Martsinkovskaya, T.D. (2015). Modern psychology ― challenges of transitivity. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya (Psychological Research), 8, 42, 1. (Retrieved from: http://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/2015v8n42/1168-martsinkovskaya42.html (review date: 28.03.2022) (In Russ.).

32. Naumova, L.D. (2009). Formation of readiness of senior schoolchildren for productive conflict resolution. Obrazovanie i nauka: Izvestiya Ural'skogo otdeleniya RAO (The education and science journal), 10, 48–59. (In Russ.).

33. Nesmeyanova, R.K. (2018). Vzaimosvyaz' obraza korporativnoj kul'tury i organizacionnoj identifikacii sotrudnikov kommercheskih predpriyatij: Diss. … kand. psihol. nauk. (Relationship between the image of corporate culture and organizational identification of employees of commercial enterprises: Ph.D. (Psychology). Moscow. (In Russ.)

34. Potashnik, М.М. (1995). School development management. In M.M. Potashnik, V.S. Lazared (Eds.). Moscow: Novaya shkola. (In Russ.).

35. Ross, L., Nisbett, R. (2000). The person and the situation. Perspectives of social psychology. Moscow: Aspekt Press. (In Russ.).

36. Scheres, H., Rhodes, C. (2006). Between cultures: Values, training and identity in a manufacturing firm. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19, 223–236.

37. Shamlikashvili, C.A., Hazanova, M.A. (2014). Method "school mediation" as a way to create a safe space and its psychological mechanisms. Psihologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie (Psychological Science and Education), 2, 26–33. (In Russ.).

38. Sokolova, N.A., Zherebkina, V.F. (2016). To the question of conflictological training of future teachers. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Seriya Pedagogicheskie nauki (Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. Psychological sciences), 7, 113–118. (In Russ.).

39. Tinus, A. (2020). Building Organizational Culture and Climate as a Strategy for Character Development in School. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 477, 40–43.

40. Torres, L.L. (2022). School Organizational Culture and Leadership: Theoretical Trends and New Analytical Proposals. Education sciences, 12, 254.

41. Varzanova, M.A. (2020). Organizational and pedagogical conditions for the inclusion of teachers in innovative activities: overcoming resistance. Yaroslavskii pedagogicheskii vestnik (Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin),1, 22–30. (In Russ.).

42. Yasvin, V.A. (2019). School environment as a subject of measurement: expertise, design, management. Moscow: Narodnoe obrazovanie. (In Russ.).

43. Yasvin, V.A., Sosnova, I.V., Cherkalina, E.V., Rybinskaya, S.N. (2004). Systemic psychological and pedagogical examination of the school: a methodological guide. (In Russ.).


Recieved: 04/06/2022

Accepted: 06/02/2022

Published: 10/31/2022

Keywords: educational environment; change response styles; school organizational culture; perception of conflicts in the school

Available online since: 31.10.2022

Issue 3, 2022