Danilova, A.G.
-
Computerized qualitative text analysisLomonosov Psychology Journal, 2021, 1. p. 220-240read more3050
-
Relevance. In applied psychology, researchers are increasingly faced with the task of analyzing large amounts of text, both verbal and visual. For these purposes, various methods of analysis have been developed and various computer programs have been created.
Objective. The possibilities of computerized qualitative text analysis are analyzed. The spectrum of problems solved by various methods of qualitative text analysis is considered.
Methods. The theoretical analysis of classical methods of qualitative text analysis is carried out. The specificity of the method of computerized discourse analysis is analyzed. The Internet searched for the most popular programs for qualitative text analysis, considered the main options and requirements for working in the program.
Results. Methods of content-, discourse-, intent-analysis, conversion and narrative analysis are briefly characterized. The computerized discourse analysis (CMDA) approach is described. An approach to solving problems of various methods of qualitative analysis of text in computer analysis of qualitative data (Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis; CAQDAS) is presented. The possibilities of some software packages developed within the CAQDAS approach are considered.
Conclusions. The advantages of using computerized discourse analysis are shown. The topic of research of methodological problems accompanying the use of CAQDAS is outlined.
Keywords: qualitative text analysis; content analysis; discourse analysis; intent analysis; conversion analysis; narrative analysis; computerized discourse analysis; CMDA; computer analysis of qualitative data; CAQDAS; researcher reflection DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2021.01.09
-
-
Quantitative methods in the historical and psychological study into the categorical structure of values and images in different culturesLomonosov Psychology Journal, 2023, 1. p. 221-246read more979
-
Background. The growing interest in the historical development of social systems requires an assessment of the possibilities for a quantitative comparison of psychological characteristics in a person and society of different eras.
Objective. The study aims to reveal the structure of social values and features of contemporary images according to verbal and visual texts of the cultures in the past.
Methods. Behavior characteristics describing G. Hofstede’s basic cultural dimensions (Hofstede, 1980) were used to encode texts. Psychosemantic assessment of the works of art perception was carried out with the use of a scale based on the multifaceted Five Factor Model of personality by P. Costa, R. McCrae (FFM; NEO-PI-R questionnaire adapted by V.E. Orel et al.) and the scale of individual image perception in media communication by L.V. Matveeva et al.
Sample. A) Ancient Greek and Roman texts of 7th c. BC — 4th c. AD, Old Russian texts of 11th–17th centuries, Byzantine texts of 5th–15th centuries and texts of medieval European culture according to the 17th c. — a total of 205 separate texts.
B) Visual stimulus material on cultures: Ancient Greece (7th–1th c. BC); Ancient Rome (7th c. BC — 4th c. AD); Byzantium (5th–15th cc.); Russia (11–19 cc.); Europe (9th, 11th–17th cc.) was assessed by respondents of different ages from 14 to 70 (N = 68).
Results. Reliability analysis and confirmatory factor analysis generally supported the structure of the five-factor model of personality and the basic dimensions of culture by G. Hofstede on the material of historical texts and works of art. The least stable dimensions are Hofstede’s Masculinity and Openness to Experience factors of the personality model. An exploratory factorial analysis of data on historical texts yielded a factor structure reflecting specific aspects of Hofstede’s dimensions. In general, the correlations between personality traits and basic cultural dimensions described by G. Hofstede and R. McCraе (Хофстеде, МакКрэй, 2010) are reproduced. The differences mainly relate to the FFM factor “Extraversion”. The features of social situations described in historical narratives that are not fixed by the characteristics of behavior that describe the basic dimensions of culture according to Hofstede are discussed.
Conclusion. The subdimensions of modern models of personality and cultural values make it possible to obtain a fairly adequate quantitative assessment of the cultures of the past.
Practical application. The results can be used to develop a methodology for the quantitative assessment of socio-cultural values in historical and psychological research.Keywords: historical psychology; psychosemantics; cultural norms and values; artistic communication; human image; five-factor personality model; content analysis; Hofstede's model of basic cultural dimensions DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2023.01.10
-