Sokolova, E. E.
PhD in Psychology
Ph.D in Psychology
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Moscow, Russia
-
Deed, Thought, and Word of Alexey Nikolaevich LeontievLomonosov Psychology Journal, 2023, 2. p. 23-45read more1294
-
Background. The article presents the most important events in the scientific biography of A.N. Leontiev (1903–1979). Some aspects of his psychological theory
of activity are being analyzed. The relevance of addressing the heritage of A.N. Leontiev and his scientific school is determined by the implemented methodology
of psychological research, which is an alternative to the approaches to the study
of consciousness that dominate in modern world science.
Objectives of the paper were to highlight those aspects of psychological theory of
activity that were successfully implemented in “highly organized practice” as well
as to discuss some controversial issues of cultural-activity psychology.
Method. Well-known works of Leontiev, his colleagues, and opponents served
as sources for the study, historical and psychological in genre and methodology.
Some archive materials, including those that have not been previously introduced
to scientific comunity were used as well.
Results. A new solution to the problem of the relation between Word and Deed,
which was debated by L.S. Vygotsky and A.N.Leontiev and is still being debated in the modern literature, is proposed. It is stated that Leontiev’s doctrine on the forms
of connection between meanings and senses in the structure of consciousness was
included in the methodological foundations of “pedagogy of freedom”, seeking to
develop a culture of thinking and personal growth in students. The examples of
the realization of this pedagogy in teaching students at the Faculty of Psychology
of Moscow State University are presented. Studying personal letters from the
family archives provided some new details about Leontiev’s administrative and
organizational activities during the Great Patriotic War.
Conclusion. The immediate tasks of the historical and psychological study of
Leontiev’s contribution are to: 1) analyze the empirical research of his school in
the 1940s and the following years; 2) study systematically the contribution of this
school to practical psychology; 3) create a complete and detailed chronology of
A.N. Leontiev’s life and work; 4) develop teaching aids for psychology students
with the explanation of the complex issues and contradictions in A.N. Leontiev’s
activity theory as well as with scientific comments on his works, within the sociocultural context of their creation.Keywords: A.N. Leontiev; L.S. Vygotsky; Kharkov School; activity; consciousness; meaning; sense; Faculty of Psychology Lomonosov Moscow State University DOI: 10.11621/LPJ-23-14
-
-
One cannot be a psychologist without being a philosopher or Why disputes on notions make senseLomonosov Psychology Journal, 2016, 1. p. 25-41read more10772
-
The article was written in the context of creative legacy of A.A. Leontiev (1936—2004). Responding to the scientist’s call to intensify psychological methodology work and enhance “the criticism of notions”, the author analyzes the history and development of the notion of “functional organ” in the psychology of activity. Contrary to the popular recent trend defining mentality (psyche, mind) as a functional organ of individual or soul, the author insists on defining mentality (psyche, mind) as a functional organ of activity, which corresponds rather to the spirit than to the letter of activity approach in psychology by interpretation of A.N. Leontiev School . Such understanding may help to bring psychology out of dichotomy of mechanistic and spiritualistic theories. Even L.S. Vygotsky used to note that without overcoming this barrier the normal development of psychological science and practice is impossible.
Keywords: A.A. Leontiev; psychological methodology; functional organ; activity; mentality; activity approach; A.N. Leontiev school DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2016.01.25
-
-
The fundamental principles of university education and A.N. Leontiev’s psychological theory of activity.Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 2011, 1. p. 12-24read more5148
-
The fundamental principles of university education (forming of dialectical thinking, the unity of teaching and upbringing, manufacture of need in self-development) taken from A.N. Leontiev’s perspective are marked out and analyzed in the article based on a number of sources including archive materials. The problems and outlooks of applying of Leontiev’s ideas are discussed in the context of current reforms of secondary and high school in Russia.
Keywords: A.N. Leontiev’s psychological theory of activity; education; upbringing; thinking; dialectical logic; forming
-
-
The school of A.N. Leontiev and its role in development of “Activity Theory” approach to psychologyLomonosov Psychology Journal, 2007, 2. p. 80-103read more4616
-
The article is devoted to the history and current state of the school of Alexey Nikolaevich Leontiev (1903-1979), an outstanding Russian psychologist, the first Dean of the faculty of psychology of Moscow state University who have made the most significant contribution to the creation and development of the activity approach in psychology. Considered in detail the stages of scientific biography A.N. Leontiev, the author identifies and analyzes the main provisions developed his school of “non-classical psychology”, the origins of which date back to L.S. Vygotsky. Special attention is paid to the analysis offered in the school of A. N. Leontiev solve the problems of the subject of psychology, nature of psyche as a specific mental functions, the relationship between internal and external activities, units of psychological analysis and development of the psyche. Selected as promising lines of development of General psychological ideas of the school of A. N. Leontiev.
Keywords: non-classical psychology; activity; psyche ; awareness; unit of analysis; A.N. Leontiev’s school; development of the psyche; the meaning
-