Article
Arestova O.N., Makhmudova S.Kh. (2018). Subjective presentation of family relations on the different levels of awareness (in adolescents). Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 1, 55-69
Abstract
Relevance. The study is devoted to the problem of family relations in adolescence. This problems seems to become very actual in recent times because of significant changes in family relations concerned with adolescents.
Objective. The hypothesis of different levels of awareness (explicit and implicit) representation of family situation in adolescence in connection with the emotional tone of relationships between family members has been tested in this research. We also propose that this fact s related with the follows parameters: adolescent gender and family unity.
Methods. 45 adolescents (22 girls and 23 boys) age of 13-14 took part in the research: 8 of them are from single-parent families (father missing), 37 – from completed families. The following methods were used: Family image test, Color Test of Relations and the questionnaire of parent’s behavior and attitudes of adolescents by E. Shafer).
Results. Results It was demonstrated that in explicit level adolescents evaluate their family situation more positively than in implicit level. Adolescents of different sex differently evaluate the degree of solidarity and emotional relationships in their families: girls consider their families more joined than boys. Both girls and boys perceive their mother and father more positively in explicit level (questionnaire) than in implicit level. Generally, girls and boys realize the estimations of family situation concerned with cohesion and emotional relationships differently. As a hole adolescents implicitly perceive their mother as more positive and important than the father.
Sections: Empirical studies;
Received: 03/06/2018Accepted: 03/13/2018
Pages: 55-69
DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2018.01.55
Keywords: parent-child interaction; stages of awareness; adolescence; emotional tone of relationships; family unity;
Available Online 30.03.2018
Table 1.
Характеристика семьи |
Девочки |
Мальчики |
Сплоченная |
36.36 |
21.91 |
Проблемная сплоченность |
40.91 |
34.26 |
Разобщенная |
22.72 |
43.83 |
Table 2.
Пол подростка |
Наименование шкал |
Рисунок (И) |
Опросник (Э) |
ЦТО (И) |
Опросник (Э) |
Уровни значимости и значения медиан |
Уровни значимости и значения медиан |
||||
Девочки |
Позитивность матери |
Р=0.007 |
Р=0.018 |
||
1.5 |
1.8 |
1.42 |
1.8 |
||
Враждебность матери |
Р=0.001 |
Р=0.000 |
|||
0.55 |
0.25 |
0.6 |
0.25 |
||
Позитивность отца |
Р=0. 022 |
Р=0.001 |
|||
1.5 |
1.8 |
1.14 |
1.8 |
||
Враждебность отца |
Р=0.000 |
Р=0.001 |
|||
0.55 |
0.15 |
0.85 |
0.15 |
||
Мальчики |
Позитивность матери |
Р=0.005 |
Р=0.033 |
||
1.5 |
0.8 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
||
Враждебность матери |
Р=0.000 |
Р=0.000 |
|||
0.55 |
0.2 |
0.35 |
0.2 |
||
Позитивность отца |
Р=0.02 |
Р=0.001 |
|||
1.5 |
1.7 |
1.14 |
1.7 |
||
Враждебность отца |
Р=0.000 |
Р=0.001 |
|||
0.45 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.2 |
References:
Aleshina, Yu.E. (1993). Individual’noe i semeynoe psikhologicheskoe konsul’tirovanie: prakticheskoe posobie [Individual and Family Psychological Consultation: Practical Toolkit]. Moscow: Nezavisimaya firma Klass.
Arestov, O.N. (2016). Kul’turnye osobennosti oposredstvovaniya v mnemicheskoy deyatel’nosti. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology], 3, 89—95.
Arestova, O.N., Bogacheva, N.V. (2013). Osobennosti samootnosheniya u podrostkov i yunoshey s blizorukost’yu. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 14. Psikhologiya [Moscow University Psychology Bulletin], 4, 92—105.
Ackard, D.M., Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., Perry, C. (2006). Parent-child connectedness and behavioral and emotional health among adolescents. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 30, 1, 59—66. doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.09.013
Bebchuk, M.A. (2012). Prakticheskaya psikhodiagnostika sem’i: Metodicheskoe posobie s prilozheniyami [Practical Psychodiagnostics of the Family: A Toolkit with Applications]. Moscow: ID Bionik.
Belinskaya, E.P., Stefanenko, T.G. (2000). Etnicheskaya sotsializatsiya podrostka [Ethnic socialization of adolescents]. Voronezh: MODEK.
Bodalev A.A., Stolin V.V. (2006, eds.) Obshchaya psikhodiagnostika [General psychodiagnosis]. St.-Petersburg: Rech’.
Cooper, С., Grotevant, H. (1987). Gender issues in the interface of family experience and adolescents’ friendship and dating identity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 247—264. doi.org/10.1007/BF02139093
Druzhinin V.N. (1996). Psikhologiya sem’i [Psychology of the family]. Moscow: KPS.
Eydemiller, E.G., Yustitskis, V.V.(1999). Psikhologiya i psikhoterapiya sem’i [Psychology and psychotherapy of the family]. St.-Petersburg: Piter.
El’konin, D.B., Dragunova, T.V., Botsmanova, M.E., Zakharova, A.V. (1967). Vozrastnye i individual’nye osobennosti mladshikh podrostkov [Age and individual characteristics of younger adolescents]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
Fel’dshteyn, D.I. (1985). Psikhologicheskie aspekty izucheniya sovremennogo podrostka. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology], 1, 21—32.
Freyd, A. (1993). Psikhologiya «Ya» i zashchitnye mekhanizmy [Psychology “I” and protective mechanisms]. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press.
Grusec, J., Goodnow, J., Kuczynski, L. (2000). New directions in analyses of parenting contributions to children’s acquisition of values. Child Development,71, 205—211. doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00135
Inac, H., Unal, F. (2013). The construction of national identity in modern times: Theoretical perspectives. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3, 11, 223—241.
Ivanisova, O.Yu., Moreva, Yu.V., Strelkina, L.I. (2016). Detsko-roditel’skie otnosheniya kak faktor sotsializatsii lichnosti rebenka. Sborniki konferentsiy NITs Sotsiosfera [Collection of conferences of NITS Sociosphere] (pp. 68—70). Praga: Vedecko vydavatelske centrum Sociosfera — CZ s.r.o.
Karabanova, O.A. (2005). Psikhologiya semeynykh otnosheniy i osnovy semeynogo konsul’tirovaniya [Psychology of family relations and the basics of family counselin]. Moscow: Gardariki.
Khomentauskas, G.T. (1986). Ispol’zovanie detskogo risunka dlya issledovaniya vnutrisemeynykh otnosheniy. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology], 1, 166—170.
Khomentauskas, G.T. (1989). Sem’ya glazami rebenka [Family through the children eyes]. Moscow: Pedagogika.
Kovalev, S.V. (1988). Psikhologiya sovremennoy sem’i [Psychology of the modern family]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.
Lichko, A.E. (1983). Psikhopatii i aktsentuatsii kharaktera u podrostkov [Psychopathy and character accentuation in adolescents]. Leningrad: Meditsina.
Liders, A.G. (2006). Psikhologicheskoe obsledovanie sem’i [Psychological examination of the family]. Moscow: Akademiya.
Makushina, O.P. (2001). Psikhologicheskaya zavisimost’ podrostkov ot roditeley: Diss. ... kand. psikhol. nauk [Psychological dependence of adolescents on parents: Diss. ... cand. psychol. science]. Moscow.
Matsumoto, D. (2002). Psikhologiya i kul’tura [Psychology and Culture]. St.-Petersburg: Praym-Evroznak.
Molchanov, S.V. (2005). Osobennosti tsennostnykh orientatsiy lichnosti v podrostkovom i yunosheskom vozraste. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie [Psychological Science and Education], 3, 16—25.
Popova, L.G., Levitskaya, E.V. (2002). «Detskoe» i «vzrosloe» vospriyatie semeynoy situatsii. Psikhologicheskiy vestnik Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Psychological bulletin of the Ural State University] (pp. 124—135). Ekaterinburg: Bank kul’turnoy informatsii.
Shil’shteyn, E.S. (2000). Osobennosti prezentatsii Ya v podrostkovom vozraste. Voprosy psikhologii [Questions of Psychology], 2, 69—78.
Stolin, V.V. (1983). Samosoznanie lichnosti [Self-awareness of personality]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta.
Vasserman, L.I., Gor’kovaya, I.A., Romitsyna, E.E. (1995). Test «Podrostki o roditelyakh»: Metodicheskoe posobie [Test «Teens about parents»: Methodical grant]. Moscow: Folium.
Venger, A.L. (2003). Psikhologicheskie risunochnye testy: Illyustrirovannoe rukovodstvo [Psychological Picture Tests: Illustrated Guide]. Moscow: VLADOS-PRESS.
Vygotskiy, L.S. (1984). Pedologiya podrostka [Pedology of a teenager]. In: Vygotskiy, L.S. Collected Works in 6 v. Vol. 4, pp. 5—243. Moscow: Pedagogika.
For citing this article:
Arestova O.N., Makhmudova S.Kh. (2018). Subjective presentation of family relations on the different levels of awareness (in adolescents). Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 1, 55-69