Adaptation of Technophobia and Technophilia Questionnaires into Russian

Background. Distrust of technology is an important barrier to its implementation into human life. In the research of attitude to computers and automated systems, special attention in psychological science has been paid to attitudes towards technology: technophobia and technophilia.

Objective. The aim is to adapt two questionnaires to Russian sample in order to measure the technophobia and technophilia attitudes, as well as to evaluate their psychometric properties.

Methods. The adaptation of the questionnaires was carried out in accordance with the requirements of psychometric standards. As part of the work, the methods of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used to assess the internal structure of the techniques. Correlation analysis was used to obtain evidence supporting questionnaires validity.

Sample. At the first stage of the study, 275 people filled out questionnaires on technophobia and technophilia, of which 194 were women (71 %) and 81 were men (29 %), the average age was 33.5 years (SD = 13.93). The second part of the study involved 545 employees of a large financial sector organization.

Results. The methods showed sufficient reliability indicators on the scales (the Cronbach’s α coefficient is higher than 0.8) and the expected correlation coefficients of the results on the questionnaires with each other and with questionnaires aimed at assessing personal anxiety, self-efficacy and personality traits (HEXACO). The internal structure of the adaptation of the questionnaires was analyzed with confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis. However, the hypothesis of the stability of the internal structure for each scale was not confirmed.

Conclusion. Adapted questionnaires can be used for research purposes. It is necessary to continue collecting empirical data on both questionnaires.

Practical application of the results. The proposed versions of the questionnaires can be used to assess technophobic and technophilic attitudes without dividing these scales into subscales. The authors have proposed an alternative version of dividing items into subscales for the technophobia questionnaire, while this version is considered as potentially more suitable, although it requires additional analysis on new data sets.

References

Baturin, N.A., et al. (2015). Russian standard for personnel testing (temporary version, created for wide discussion in 2015). Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya (Organizational Psychology), 2 (5), 67–138. (In Russ.).

Baturin, N.A., Melnikova, N.N. (2009). Test development technology: part I. Vestnik YuUrGU. Psikhologiya. Psikhofiziologiya (Vestnik SUSU. Psychology. Psychophysiology), 30 (163), 4–14. (Retrieved from https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tehnologiyarazrabotki-testov-chast-i) (review date: 08.24.2021). (In Russ.).

Carr, N. (2015). Glass cage. Automation and us. In N. Carr (Eds.); lane from English A. Anvaer. M.: KoLibri, Azbuka-Atticus. (In Russ.).

Downing, S.M. (2006). Twelve Steps for Effective Test Development. In S.M. Downing, T.M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 3–25). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Egorova, M.S., Parshikova, O.V. (2015). Adaptation of the hexaco-pi-r questionnaire on a Russian sample. Modern psychodiagnostics of Russia. Overcoming the crisis: a collection of materials from the III All-Russian Conference on Psychological Diagnostics: in 2 vol. 1, 129–134. In N.A. Baturin, et al. (Eds.). Publishing center of SUSU, Chelyabinsk. (In Russ.).

Khanin, Yu.L. (1976). A brief guide to the use of the Reactive and Personal Anxiety Scale by Ch.D. Spielberger. Leningrad: LNIITEK. (In Russ.).

Khasawneh, O.Y. (2018). Technophobia: Examining its hidden factors and defining it. Technology in Society, 54, 93–100.

Kline, P. (1994). Reference Guide to Test Design. Kyiv: PAN Ltd. (In Russ.).

Martínez-Córcoles, M., Teichmann, M., Murdvee, M. (2017). Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire. Technology in Society, 51, 183–188.

Nestik, T.A. (2018). Socio-psychological aspects of a person’s attitude to new technologies. In A.A. Oboznov, A.L. Zhuravlev (Eds.), (pp. 50–73). Institute of Psychology RAS, Moscow. (In Russ.).

Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, Е. (2006). Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human — robot interaction. AI Soc, 20 (2), 138–150.

Schwarzer, R., Erusalem M., Romek V.G. (1996). Russian version of the general self-efficacy scale. Inostrannaya psikhologiya (Foreign Psychology), 7, 71–76. (In Russ.).

Shmelev, A.G. (2013). Practical testing. Testing in education, applied psychology and personnel management. M.: IPC Maska LLC. (In Russ.).

Soldatova, G.U., Nestik, T.A., Rasskazova, E.I., Dorokhov, E.A. (2021). Psychodiagnostics of technophobia and technophilia: development and testing of a questionnaire of attitudes towards technology for adolescents and parents. Sotsial’naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo (Social Psychology and Society), 4 (12), 170–188. https://doi. org/10.17759/sps.2021120410 (In Russ.).