ISSN 01370936
Ru | En
Russian Psychological Society
The Faculty of Psychology. Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Main RSS Search

Arestova O.N.

Ph.D in Psychology
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Moscow, Russia

Publications

Filter
En:
DOI Number:
  

Arestova O.N., Makhmudova S.Kh. (2018). Subjective presentation of family relations on the different levels of awareness (in adolescents). Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. Series 14. Psychology, 1, 55-69

Relevance. The study is devoted to the problem of family relations in adolescence. This problems seems to become very actual in recent times because of significant changes in family relations concerned with adolescents.

Objective. The hypothesis of different levels of awareness (explicit and implicit) representation of family situation in adolescence in connection with the emotional tone of relationships between family members has been tested in this research. We also propose that this fact s related with the follows parameters: adolescent gender and family unity.

Methods. 45 adolescents (22 girls and 23 boys) age of 13-14 took part in the research: 8 of them are from single-parent families (father missing), 37 – from completed families. The following methods were used: Family image test, Color Test of Relations and the questionnaire of parent’s behavior and attitudes of adolescents by E. Shafer).

Results. Results It was demonstrated that in explicit level adolescents evaluate their family situation more positively than in implicit level. Adolescents of different sex differently evaluate the degree of solidarity and emotional relationships in their families: girls consider their families more joined than boys. Both girls and boys perceive their mother and father more positively in explicit level (questionnaire) than in implicit level. Generally, girls and boys realize the estimations of family situation concerned with cohesion and emotional relationships differently. As a hole adolescents implicitly perceive their mother as more positive and important than the father.

Received: 03/06/2018

Accepted: 03/13/2018

Pages: 55-69

DOI: 10.11621/vsp.2018.01.55

Available Online: 03/30/2018

Arestova O.N., Bogacheva N.V.(2013). Specific features of self-attitude of myopic teenagers and youths.The Moscow University Herald. Series 14. Psychology, 4, 92-105

a:2:{s:4:"TEXT";s:1426:"The empirical study was carried out to check the hypothesis that myopia
can influence the development of self-attitude features of teenagers and youths.
50 participants took part in the study (30 myopic participants — 12 males and
18 females, and 20 participants with normal eyesight — 8 males and 12 females)
from 15 to 20 years old, senior pupils and students. Projective methods and
inventories were used: the nonexistent animal figure test, self-portrait picture test,
S.R. Pantileev’s methodic of self-attitude measurement (questionnaire), and self-
attitude scoring questionnaire developed by us. The results of the study confirm
the hypothesis and show that myopic teenagers and youths has specific features
of self-attitude, such as the disposition towards self-criticism, negative attitude
towards characteristics of self, the decline of communicational self-attitude and
communicational activity, the tendency to deep intelligent reflection of self with
great attention toward weaknesses. Moreover, myopic respondents show rigid
and extreme scores of self-attitude, passiveness in communication, sensitivity
towards other people’s scores. It was shown, that self-attitude of myopic teenagers
resembles that of blind and visually impaired people. It was also shown that myopic
teenagers are more self-critical and tend to negative evaluation of themselves as
communicational partners.";s:4:"TYPE";s:4:"html";}

Received: 09/17/2013

Pages: 92-105

Available Online: 12/30/2013

Arestova O.N.(2008).According to O.K. Tikhomirov theory the structure of thinking activity are influenced by motivation factor. Moscow University Psychology Bulletin. Series 14.Psychology,2,128-139

This fact was successfully investigated both theoretically and experimentally. It was shown that motivation determines the various aspects of thinking: the goalsetting strategy, the perspective goalsetting, emotional regulations, the relation between concrete and abstract components, egocentric features. The most important point of motivational influences is connected with the moment of motivational conflict. This conflict may switch the thinking of the subject from cognition to the special personal activity. This kind of thinking activity may be defined as a conceptualization of conflict personality meanings.

Pages: 128-139

Available Online: 06/30/2008


About Editorial Board Volumes Authors For Authors Contacts
Moscow University Psychology Bulletin, 2007 - 2018