References

Ackerman R., & Goldsmith M. (2011). Metacognitive Regulation of Text Learning: On Screen Versus on Paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied,1, 18–32. DOI: doi.org/10.1037/a0022086 .

Ackerman R., & Lauterman T. (2012). Taking reading comprehension exams on screen or on paper? A metacognitive analysis of learning texts under time pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 5, 1816–1828. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.023 .

Apanovich V. V., Znakov V. V., Aleksandrov Yu. I. (2017). Aprobatsiya shkaly analitichnosti-kholistichnosti na rossiiskoi vyborke[Testing the analytic-holistic scale on the Russian sample]. Psikhologicheskii Zhurnal [Psychological Journal], 5, 80–96. DOI: doi.org/10.7868/S0205959217050075.

Arestova O. N. (2011) Intuitivnoe ponimanie smysla poslovits[Intuitive meaning of proverbs]. Voprosy psikhologii [Psychology issues], 2, 129–138.

Bakanov A. S., Sivash O. N. (2017). Vzaimosvyaz' kognitivnogo stilya i professional'noi uspeshnosti pri vzaimodeistvii s informatsionnymi sistemami[The relationship of cognitive style and professional success in interacting with information systems]. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya i psikhologiya truda[Organizational psychology and psychology of work], 1, 161–174.

Bakanov S. A. (2015). Podkhod k rarabotke metodiki obucheniya spetsialistov strukturirovaniyu tekstovoi informatsii[An approach to the development of a methodology for training specialists in texturing information]Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya psikhologii truda i organizatsionnoi psikhologii[Current trends in the development of labor psychology and organizational psychology].In L.G. Dikoi et al (ed) Moscow: Institut psikhologii RAN. 694-698.

Blinnikova I.V., Rabeson M.D., Izmalkova A.I. (2019). Eye movements and word recognition during visual semantic search: diferences between expert and novice language learners. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 12(1), 129–146. DOI: doi.org/10.11621/pir.2019.0110 .

Britt M. A., Rouet J.-F., A. Perfetti C.A. (2012). Using Hypertext to Study and Reason About Historical Evidence. Hypertext and cognition/ eds. J.-F. Rouet, J. J. Levonen, A. Dillon, R. J. Spiro. Taylor & Francis. 43–73. DOI: doi.org/10.4324/9780203053522-10 .

Burmistrov I., Zlokazova T., Ishmuratova I., Semenova M. (2016). Legibility of Light and Ultra-Light Fonts. Proceedings of the 9th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction- NordiCHI’16. 1–6. DOI: doi.org/10.1145/2971485.2996745 .

Calisir F., Gurel Z. (2003). Influence of text structure and prior knowledge of the learner on reading comprehension, browsing and perceived control. Computers in Human Behavior,2, 135–145. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00058-4 .

Coiro J. (2011). Predicting Reading Comprehension on the Internet: Contributions of Offline Reading Skills, Online Reading Skills, and Prior Knowledge. Journal of Literacy Research : A Publication of the Literacy Research Association,4, 352–392. DOI: doi.org/10.1177/1086296X11421979 .

DeStefano D., LeFevre J. A. (2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 1616–1641. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012 .

Dillon A. (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 10, 1297–1326.

Duncan L. G., Mcgeown S. P., Griffiths Y. M., Stothard S. E., & Dobai A. (2016). Adolescent reading skill and engagement with digital and traditional literacies as predictors of reading comprehension. British Journal of Psychology, 2, 209–238. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12134 .

Geibl E. (2019). Tsifrovaya transformatsiya shkol'nogo obrazovaniya. Mezhdunarodnyĭ opyt, trendy, global'nye rekomendatsii[Digital transformation of school education. International experience, trends, global recommendations] In P. A. Sergomanova. (ed) Moscow: Natsional'nyĭ issledovatel'skiĭ universitet «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki»[National Research University Higher School of Economics].

Gorlova N.V. (2019). Razreshenie konfliktov avtonomii: podkhod k issledovaniyu lichnostnoi avtonomii podrostkov[Conflict resolution of autonomy: an approach to the study of personal autonomy of adolescents]. Natsional'nyi psikhologicheskii zhurnal [National Psychological Journal],1, 47-58.

Graff M. (2003). Assessing learning from hypertext: An individual differences perspective. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 4, 425–438.

Hofman R., van Oostendorp H. (1999). Cognitive Effects of a Structural Overview in a Hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 129–140. DOI: doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00101 .

Hubber P. J., Outhwaite L. A., Chigeda A., McGrath S., Hodgen J., & Pitchford N. J. (2016). Should Touch Screen Tablets Be Used to Improve Educational Outcomes in Primary School Children in Developing Countries? Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 1-4 DOI: doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00839 .

Hwang Y., Yi M. Y. (2002). Predicting the Use of Web-Based Information Systems: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Efficacy. Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems. Dallas, TX. 1076–1081.

Kauffman D. F. (2004). Self-Regulated Learning in Web-Based Environments: Instructional Tools Designed to Facilitate Cognitive Strategy Use, Metacognitive Processing, and Motivational Beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research,1–2, 139–161. DOI: doi.org/10.2190/AX2D-Y9VM-V7PX-0TAD .

Lauterman T., Ackerman R. (2014). Overcoming screen inferiority in learning and calibration. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 455–463. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.046 .

Lee M. J., Tedder M. C. (2003). The effects of three different computer texts on readers’ recall: Based on working memory capacity. Computers in Human Behavior, 6, 767–783. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(03)00008-6 .

Li L. Y., Chen G. D., & Yang S. J. (2013). Construction of cognitive maps to improve e-book reading and navigation. Computers and Education,1, 32–39. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.010 .

Lin C.-H., Davidson-Shivers G. V. (1996). Effects of Linking Structure and Cognitive Style on Students’ Performance and Attitude in a Computer-Based Hypertext Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 317–329. DOI: doi.org/10.2190/JU82-YHCA-X5DR-EHYU .

Linderholm T., Van den Broek P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology,4, 778–784. DOI: doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.778 .

Litvinov A. V., Ivolina T. V. (2013).Metakognitsiya : ponyatie, struktura, svyaz' s intellektual'nymi i kognitivnymi sposobnostyami (po materialam zarubezhnykh issledovanii)[Metacognition: Concept, structure, association with intellect and cognitive processes]. Sovremennaya Zarubezhnaya Psikhologiya [Modern Foreign Psychology], 3, 59–70.  

Lodewijks H. (1982). Self-Regulated Versus Teacher-Provided Sequencing of Information in Learning From Text. Advances in Psychology,8, 509–520. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62715-6 .

L'yuis D. (2015). Neiromarketing v deistvii. Kak proniknut' v mozg pokupatelya[Neuromarketing in action. How to penetrate the buyer's brain]. Moscow: Izd-vo Mann, Ivanov i Ferber. 

McDonald S., Stevenson R. J. (1998). Effects of Text Structure and Prior Knowledge of the Learner on Navigation in Hypertext. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1, 18–27. DOI: doi.org/10.1518/001872098779480541 .

Morineau T., Blanche C., Tobin L., Guéguen N. (2005). The emergence of the contextual role of the e-book in cognitive processes through an ecological and functional analysis. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 3, 329–348. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.10.002 .

Naumann J. (2015). A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation, and performance in digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior,53, 263–277. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.051 .

Shapiro A., Niederhauser D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: research issues and findings. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 605–620. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2011.03.004 .

Sidneva A. N. (2011). Osobennosti orientirovki shkol'nikov na zadannoe znanie pri reshenii zadach v raznykh sistemakh obucheniya[Peculiarities of orientation of schoolchildren on a given knowledge when solving problems in different educational systems]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta [Moscow University Psychology Bulletin]. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya, 3, 110-116.

Slozhnye analogii // Al'manakh psikhologicheskikh testov. Ed. S. Rimskij, R.R. Rimskaya. M., 1995. 131-133.

Solodov M. Yu. (2016). Gipertekst kak predmet psikhologicheskogo issledovaniya v kul'turno - deyatel'nostnoi programme[Hypertext as a subject of psychological research in the cultural - activity program]. Obrazovatel'nye Tekhnologii i Obshchestvo [Educational Technology and Society],2, 621–629.

Takacs Z. K., Swart E. K., Bus A. G. (2014). Can the computer replace the adult for storybook reading? A meta-analysis on the effects of multimedia stories as compared to sharing print stories with an adult. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. DOI: doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01366 .

Tashev T.Yu. (2017). Kognitivnyi podkhod k modelirovaniyu cheloveko-komp'yuternogo vzaimodeistviya [Cognitive approach to modeling human-computer interaction]. University Annual Science Conference of National Military University. Veliko Turnovo, 207-213. 

Voiskunskii A.E. (2017). Internet kak prostranstvo poznaniya: psikhologicheskie aspekty primeneniya gipertekstovykh struktur[Internet as a space of knowledge: psychological aspects of the use of hypertext structures] [Elektronnyi resurs]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya [Modern foreign psychology],6(4), 7–20. DOI: doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2017060401 .