Dynumics of intellectual confidence in problem solving

Background. The problem of criteria for evaluating solution success is one of the most important for psychology of creative thinking. Evaluation of the solution by the subject during the process of thinking in the form of «confidence / doubt» can be criteria and basis for subject’s experiencing potential success or failure, which leads to continuation or stop in solving.

The objective. The study was to research the dynamics of intellectual confidence / doubt at different stages of problem-solving process.

Sample. The study involved 66 university students, specialists and non- specialists in relation to the content of the tasks.

Methods. The subjects solved 8 problematic tasks of scientific and artistic content with hints and estimate interest and confidence at different stages of solving with subjective scales. The following methods were used for intellectual characteristics “Raven’s Progressive Matrices”, “Complex Analogies”.

Results. 6 types of dynamics of intellectual confidence were identified, which correlated in various ways with the success of the solution. Successful solution of problematic scientific situations for specialists is associated with confidence at every stage, for non-specialists it is associated with doubts at the stages of understanding the problem and the formulation of solution. For problematic situations of artistic content solved by non-specialist, the following types of dynamics are associated with successful solution: «doubt — doubt — confidence», «confidence at all stages»; the latter was also observed with an unsuccessful solution. For this reason 2 types of confidence were identified: (1) reasonable, based on hints, leading to a successful solution, and (2) non- reasonable, without relying on a hint, not leading to a successful solution.

Conclusion. The procedural criteria to evaluate solution are the intellectual emotions of confidence or doubt that regulate the process of thinking. Depending on the stage of solution and the content of the task, intellectual confidence changes in different ways for specialists and non-specialists, performing the function of a preliminary assessment and regulation of solving process.

References

Ariel, R., Lembeck, N., Moffat, S., Hertzog, C. (2018). Are there Sex Differences in Confidence and Metacognitive Monitoring Accuracy for Everyday, Academic and Psychometrically Measured Spatial Ability? Intelligence, 70, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.08.001

Avhustiuk, M., Pasichnyk, I., Kalamazh, R. (2018). The Illusion of Knowing in Metacognitive Monitoring: Effects of the Type of Information and of Personal, Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Individual Psychological Characteristics. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 14, 317–341. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v14i2.1418

Dotan, D., Meyniel, F., Dehaene, S. (2017). On-line confidence monitoring during decision- making. Cognition, 171, 112–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogni-tion.2017.11.001

Gambetti, E., Marinello, F., Zucchelli, M., Nori, R., Giusberti, F. (2020). Fast thoughts and metacognitive feelings: The role of cognitive styles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 10, 352–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2225

Golovina, E.V., Skotnikova, I.G., Elliott, M. (2009). The phenomenon of confidence and its manifestations in Russian and German cultures. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya (Experimental Psychology), 2 (1), 23–34 (In Russ.).

Golovina, E.V., Timofeeva, T.B. (2008). Confidence in cognition and communication In Knowledge in the structure of communication. (Eds.), In V.A. Barabanshchikova, E.S. Samoilenko. Moscow: Institut Psihologii RAN. (pp. 143–150) (In Russ.).

Grimaldi, P., Lau, H., Basso, M. (2015). There are things that we know that we know, and there are things that we do not know we do not know: Confidence in decision-making. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 55, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.04.006

Gusev, A.N. (2004). Psychophysics of sensory tasks: System-activity analysis of human behavior in a situation of uncertainty. M.: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo universiteta. (In Russ.).

Gusev, A.V., Sharagin, V.I. (2016). The study of the psychological well-being of students-psychologists MSUPE. Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya (Experimental Psychology), 15, 12-2, 19–30 (In Russ.).

Hirt, E.R., Levine, G.M., McDonald, H.E., Melton, R.J., Martin, L.L. (1997). The Role of Mood in Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects of Performance: Single or Multiple Mechanisms? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 602–629. https:// doi.org/10.1006/JESP.1335

Kahneman, D., Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for Intuitive Expertise: A Failure to Disagree. American Psychologist, 64 (6), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016755

Korobkova, E.A. (1995). Complex analogies. Almanac of psychological tests. M.: KSP.

Lubart, T. (2009). Psychology of creativity. M.: Kogito-Centre. (In Russ.).

Martin, L.L., Ward, D.W., Achee, J.W., Wyer, R.S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 317–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.3.317

Matyushkin, A.M. (2017). Psychology of thinking. Thinking as a solution of problem situations: textbook. (Eds.), In A.A. Matyushkina. 2nd ed., rev. and additional. M.: Mezhdunarodnie otnoshenia. (In Russ.).

Matyushkina, A.A. (2015). Levels of solving a problem task as a reflection of the depth of thinking. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 14. Psikhologiya (Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology), 3, 93–107 (In Russ.).

Matyushkina, A.A., Kunashenko, M.I. (2019). Creativity as a prerequesites for solving problem situations. Aktual’nye problemy psikhologicheskogo znaniya (Actual problems of psychological knowledge), 1, 61–73 (In Russ.).

Meyniel, F., Sigman, M., Mainen, Z. (2015). Confidence as Bayesian probability: From neural origins to behavior. Neuron, 88, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neu-ron.2015.09.039

Pallier, G., Wilkinson R., Danthiir V., Kleitman S., Knezevic G., Stankov L., Roberts, R. (2002). The Role of Individual Differences in the Accuracy of Confidence Judgments. The Journal of General Psychology, 129, 257–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221300209602099

Raven, J.K., Kurt, J.H., Raven, J. (1996). A Guide to Raven’s Progressive Matrices and Vocabulary Scales. M. (In Russ.).

Romek, V.G. (1997). Self-confidence as a socio-psychological characteristic: Avtoreferat diss. … candidate of psychological sciences. Rostov. state un-t. Rostov-on-Don (In Russ.).

Rubinshtein, S.L. (2000). Fundamentals of general psychology. St. Petersburg: Piter (In Russ.).

Schwarz, N. (2012). Feelings-as-Information Theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology, 1, 289–308. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215

Schwarz, N., Clore, G. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45 (3), 513. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 3514.45.3.513

Serebryakova, E.A. (2000). Self-confidence and the conditions for its formation in student youth. M.: Academia (In Russ.).

Skotnikova, I.G. (2019). The concept and study of confidence in psychology. In Development of concepts in modern psychology. T. 2. In A.L. Zhuravleva, E.A. Sergienko. M.: Izd. IP RAN. (In Russ.).

Vasiliev, I.A., Popluzhny, V.L., Tikhomirov, O.K. (1980). Emotions and thinking. M.: Izdatelskii Dom MGU (In Russ.).