Social Success оf the Subject, Environment, Resources: Open Questions.

Background. Historically changing ideas about the social success of a person, its specificity for representatives of different social groups, the expansion of the number of criteria for describing this phenomenon are becoming a permanently relevant scientific and scientific-practical problem. Associated with it is the phenomenon of «resources», in the explanation of which there are many open questions.

Object of the study is to study the spatial characteristics of the conditions of the social micro- and mesoenvironment as potential resources for the social success of subjects.

Methods. Historical-theoretical analysis, empirical research (author's method — questionnaire «Dynamics of professional life style»), methods of parametric statistics.

Results. An analysis of the survey data of 482 men and women aged 30–50 years (132 civil servants, 129 engineers and heads of departments of industrial enterprises, 221 managers) showed that higher assessments of the subjective significance of environmental conditions as “professional factors” , updated as resources, and the largest number of intercorrelations (with r ≥ 0.300) took place in the sample of civil servants; smaller ones — engineers and heads of departments of industrial enterprises and in a sample of managers.

Conclusion. Different conditions of the social environment are not equally significant for all people (persons of different sex, age, working in different fields of activity, having different experience, etc.) in their positive and negative impact on various manifestations of a person's success. Differences in environmental conditions, reflected as the specificity of the correlation pleiades for each group, indicate a non-separate effect on the success of the subject. Both individual conditions and their combinations represent relatively stable, integral and closed spaces. The conditions of the parental family, one's family, formed by a person's activity in the spheres of his interpersonal relations, in their subjective perception and subjective significance for different people, act as different, isolated spaces.

References

Benach, J., Vives, A., Amable, M., Vanroelen, C., Tarafa, G., Muntaner, C. (2014). Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 229–253.

Bonkalo, T.I., Tsygankova, M.N. (2015). Actualization of personal and professional self-determination of students with disabilities in the context of inclusive education. Moscow: Izd-vo RGSU. (In Russ.).

Cicchetti, D., Rogosch, F. A. (1997). The role of self-organization in the promotion of resilience in maltreated children. Development and Psychopathology, 9 (4), 799–817.

Demin, A.N. (2021). Psychology of precarious employment: formation of the subject area, main problems and approaches to their study. Organizatsionnaya psikhologiya (Organizational psychology), 11 (2), 98–123. (In Russ.).

Diener, E., Fujita, F. (1995). Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: A nomothetic and idiographic approach. Journal of Social Psychology, 68 (5), 926–935.

Dorfman, L.Ya., Kalugin, A.Yu. (2021). Individual-intellectual integration of a person. Moscow: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN». (In Russ.).

Ilyin, E.P. (2008). Differential psychology of professional activity. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russ.).

Khazova, S.A., Dor'eva, E.A. (2012). Subject resources: theory and practice of research. Kostroma: Izd-vo: KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova. (In Russ.).

Kibalchenko, I.A., Exakusto, T.V. (2021). Psychology of creativity, giftedness and genius. Taganrog: Izd-vo Yuzhnogo feder. un-ta. (In Russ.).

Laktionova, A.I. (2017). Vitality and social adaptation of adolescents. Moscow: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN». (In Russ.).

Lewchuk, W. (2017). Precarious jobs: Where are they, and how do they affect well-being? Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28 (3), 402–419.

Makhnach, A.V. (2016). Human and family viability: socio-psychological paradigm. Moscow: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN». (In Russ.).

Masten, A. S., Obradović, J. (2006). Competence and resilience in development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 13–27, doi: 10.1196/ annals.1376.003

Mazilov, V.A. (2020). The subject of psychology. Yaroslavl: RIO YAGPU. (In Russ.).

Nasledov, A.D. (2007). SPSS: Computer Data Analysis in Psychology and Social Sciences. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russ.).

Rodina, O. N. (1996). On the concept of «success of labor activity». Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seria 14, Psikhologiya (Psychology) , 14 (3), 60–67. (In Russ.).

Shadrikov, V.D. (2013). Psychology of human activity. Moscow: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN»

Taylor, Sh.E. (1995). Health psychology. Boston: McGraw Hills, Inc.

Tedeschi, R. G., Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15 (1), 1–18.

Tolochek, V.A. (2020). Psychology of work. St. Petersburg: Peter. (In Russ.).

Tolochek, V.A. (2021). Technologies of professional selection. Moscow: Yurayt. (In Russ.).

Tolochek, V.A., Denisova, V.G. (2013). The dynamics of professional development in the views of the subject: self-assessments as self-sufficient empirical data. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal (Psychological journal), 34 (6), 29–39. (In Russ.).

Tolochek, V.A., Denisova, V.G., Zhuravleva, N.I. (2011). Dynamics and conditions for the formation of the subject in socionomic professions. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal (Psychological journal), 32 (6), 41–48. (In Russ.).

Ushakov, D.V. (2020). On the way to a holistic vision of man. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki (Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 17 (4), 617–629. doi: 10.17323/1813-8918-2020-4-617-629 (In Russ.).

Vodopyanova, N.E. (2014). Resursnoye obespecheniye protivodeystviya professional'nomu vygoraniyu sub"yektov truda (na primere spetsialistov «sub"yekt-sub"yektnykh» professiy): Avtoref. diss. … dokt. psikhol. Nauk. (Resource support for counteracting professional burnout of subjects of labor (on the example of specialists in “subject-subject” professions). Doctoral dissertation (Psychology). SPb. (In Russ.).