Application of cultural-historical and activity theory in educational research and practice

Cultural-historical and activity theory has proposed many important theoretical ideas for the educational sciences, which inspired the creation of different pedagogical approaches and models around the world. It is worth noticing that many important theoretical concepts of the cultural-historical and activity theory have become universally accepted and used in the contexts of education regardless of the prevailing theoretical paradigms.

This is probably the cost that has to be paid for being widely known. It is not the first time when certain theoretical concepts become widespread, a deeper systemic understanding of psychological theory itself is lost. Despite the fact that such a fate befell many of the concepts of the cultural-historical activity theory, there are many interesting attempts to deepen and further develop the approach.

The introductory article introduces several important theoretical statements formulated by the creators of cultural-historical and activity theory that have significantly contributed to the development of pedagogical ideas and based on which important educational research is being conducted today. It discusses in detail how the ideas of Vygotsky, A.N. Leontiev, D.B. Elkonin, Davydov, Galperin, Talyzina, N.N. Podd'iakov and other Russian scholars were understood and further developed in Scandinavia, other countries, and especially in the educational research of Latin American scholars. The introductory article ends by introducing the topics and research problems of scientific articles published in this special issue of the journal.

References

Aidarova, L.I. (1978). Psikhologiceskie problemy obuceniya mladshih shkol’nikov russkomu yazyku. M.: Pedagogika.

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

Bodrova, E., Davydov, V., Petrovski, V., & Sterkina, R. (1990). Opyt postroeniya psikhologo–pedagogiceskoi kontseptsii doshkolnogo vospitaniya. Voprosy psikhologii, 34(3), 63-72.

Davydov, V. V. (Ed.) (1988). Kontseptsia doshkol’nogo vospitaniya /Proekt/. Moscow: VNIK “Shkola.”

Engeström, Y. (1982). Perustietoa opetuksesta [Basic knowledge about teaching] Helsinki: Valtiovarainministeriö. ISBN 951-859-511-9. Accessed at http://hdl.handle.net/10224/3665

Engeström, Y. (2020). Ascending from the Abstract to the Concrete as a Principle of Expansive Learning Psychological Science and Education. 25(5), 31- 43.

Engeness, I. (2021). P.Y. Galperin’s Development of Human Mental Activity. Lectures in Educational Psychology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Galperin, P.Ya. (1959). Razvitije issledovanij po formirovaniju umstvennyh deistvij [Research on the development of mental actions]. Psychological Science in the USSR, 1, 441–469.

Hakkarainen, P. (ed.) (2004). The past and future of activity theory. Editor’s introduction: Challengers of activity theory. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42, 2–3.

Hakkarainen, P. (2006). Learning and development in play. In J. Einarsdottir & J. Wagner (Eds.), Nordic childhoods and early education (pp. 183-222). Connecticut: Information Age Publishing.

Hakkarainen, P. (2008). The challenges and possibilities of narrative learning approach in the Finnish early childhood education system. International Journal of Educational Research, 47, 292-300.

Hakkarainen P., Bredikyte M. (2020). Playworlds and Narratives as a Tool of Developmental Early Childhood Education. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie = Psychological Science and Education, Vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 40—50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2020250404 (In Russ.)

Kudriavtsev, V. (2017). Stanovlenie svobody. Sovremennoe doshkol’noe vospitanie. 1, 12-21.

Leontiev, A.N. (1994). Filosofiya psikhologii. Moscow: IMGU.

Leontiev, A.A. (ed.) (1996). Vygotsky. Antologiya gumannoi pedagogiki. Moscow: Dom Shalvy Amonashvili.

Leontiev, A.A. (2006). Object psikhologii i object v psikhologii. In Leontiev, A.A. (ed.), Psikhologiceskaia teoriya deyatel’nosti. Vsera, segodnya, zavtra. (pp. 61–74). Moscow: Smysl

Leontiev, D.A. (ed.), (2005). A.N. Leontiev’s creative path. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology 43(3-4).

Lindqvist, G. The aesthetics of play. Upps. Stud. Educ. 62. Uppsala: Uppsala University, 1995.

Podd’iakov, N.N. (1996). Osobennosti razvitiia detei doshkol’nogo vozrasta. Moscow: Rossiiskaiia Akademija obrazovanija assotsiatsija “Professional’noe obrazovanie”.

Solovieva, Yu. (2016) Enseñanza del lenguaje escrito. Mexico: Trillas.

Solovieva, Yu. y Quintanar, L. (2016). El dibujo como actividad formativa en la edad preescolar. México: Trillas.

Solovieva, Yu. & Quintanar, L. (2017). Enseñanza de lectura. Método práctico para la formación lectora. México, Trillas.

Solovieva, Yu. & Quintanar, L. (2019). Playing activity with orientation as a Method for Preschool Development. Psychological Educational Studies. 11(4), 49-66. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.201911040.

Solovieva, Yu. & Quintanar, L. (2020). Enseñanza y desarrollo de la comprensión y la producción del lenguaje. México: CONCYTEP.

Solovieva, Y., & Quintanar, L. (2021). Playing with Social Roles in Online Sessions for Preschoolers. Кul'turno- istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 17(2), 123—132. DOI: https://doi. org/10.17759/chp.2021170212

Talyzina, N.F. (1983). Formirovanie poznavatel’noi dejatel’nosti uchashchihsia. Moscow: Znanie.

Talizina, N.F., Solovieva, Yu. & Quintanar, L. (2017) Enseñanza de las matemáticas desde la teoría de la actividad. México: CEIDE.

Talizina, N.F. (2019) La teoría de la actividad aplicada a la enseñanza. México: Universidad Autónoma de Puebla.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1966). Igra I ee rol’ v psikhicheskom razvitii rebenka. Voprosy psikkhologii. 6, 62-68.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1977). Play and its role in the mental development of the child. In M. Cole (Ed.), Soviet Developmental Psychology (pp. 76–99). White Plains, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1986). Pedagogicheskaia psikhologiia. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press.