Moral decision-making during COVID-19 pandemic

Relevance. The COVID-19 pandemic reveals the problem of moral choices for a large number of people: who should be treated first; who can be considered as a subject for urgent vaccines and drugs testing; choice between personal convenience and observation of restrictions for the sake of the “common good.” 

The objective of the study was to evaluate whether the stress experienced by people during the COVID-19 pandemic can change moral decision making. 

Materials and methods. The data of an online survey conducted from March 30 to May 31 (311 people) were analyzed. The survey included sociodemographic questions, questions about assessing one’s current condition, the Simptom Check List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), and the Moral Dilemmas Test, consisting of 30 dilemmas. 

The relationship of a number of utilitarian choices in personal moral dilemmas with sociodemographic characteristics, respondents' assessments of their state and psychopathological characteristics was analyzed. Solving personal moral dilemmas was considered within subgroups of respondents with a high level of somatization and a high level of psychopathological symptoms and it was reviewed separately. 

Results. The results showed a high level of distress throughout the survey and an increase of utilitarian choices in personal moral dilemmas by the end of the survey. The number of choices in personal dilemmas was lower among older respondents, higher among men, and positively correlated with psychopathological symptoms. In the subgroup with a high level of somatization, personal choices slightly decreased by the end of the survey. On the contrary, in the subgroup with high levels of psychopathological symptoms, the number of personal choices significantly increased. 

Conclusions. Against the background of quarantine, assessments of moral standards change. The level of stress ambiguously affects moral decisions. A high level of somatization leads to a decrease in utilitarian personal choices, and a higher level of psychopathological symptoms leads to an increase in utilitarianшchoices. Utilitarian personal choices are more often made by men and younger people. 

References

1. Arutyunova K., & Alexandrov Yu. (2016). Factors of gender and age in moral judgment of actions. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 37(2), 79–91. (in Russ.)

2. Baradell J.G., & Klein K. (1993). Relationship of life stress and body consciousness to hypervigilant decision making. Journal of personality and social psychology, 64(2), 267–273. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.267

3. Bartels D.M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108(2), 381–417. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.001

4. Bartels D.M., & Pizarro D.A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121(1), 154–161. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010

5. Cellini N., Canale N., Mioni G., & Costa S. (2020). Changes in sleep pattern, sense of time and digital media use during COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. Journal of Sleep Research, e13074. 

6. Crockett M.J. (2013). Models of morality. Trends Cogn Sci, 17(8), 363–366. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.005

7. Damasio A.R. (1994). Descartes' error : emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Putnam.

8. Damasio A.R. (2003). Looking for Spinoza : joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain(1st ed.). Orlando, Florida: Harcourt.

9. Damasio A.R., Tranel D., & Damasio H. (1991). Somatic markers and the guidance of behaviour: theory and preliminary testing. In H.S. Levin, H.M. Eisenberg, & A.L. Benton (Eds.), Frontal lobe function and dysfunction. New York: Oxford University Press.

10. Derogatis L.R., & Savitz K.L. (2000). The SCL-90-R and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) in Primary Care. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), Handbook of psychological assessment in primary care settings(pp. 297–334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

11. Djeriouat H., & Trémolière B. (2014). The Dark Triad of personality and utilitarian moral judgment: The mediating role of Honesty/Humility and Harm/Care. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 11–16. 

12. Enikolopov S.N., Medvedeva T.I., Kazmina O.Yu., &Vorontsova O.Yu. (2018). Moral judgments and implicit associations with “life” and “death” at suicidal risk. Suicidology, 1(30), 44–52. (in Russ.)

13. Fagan S.E., Kofler L., Riccio S., & Gao Y. (2020). Somatic Marker Production Deficits do not Explain the Relationship between Psychopathic Traits and Utilitarian Moral Decision Making.Brain Sciences, 10(5), 303. 

14. Fumagalli M., Ferrucci R., Mameli F., Marceglia S., Mrakic-Sposta S., Zago S., … Priori A. (2010). Gender-related differences in moral judgments. Cogn Process, 11(3), 219–226. doi:10.1007/s10339-009-0335-2

15. Gleichgerrcht E., & Young L. (2013). Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. PLoS One, 8(4), e60418. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060418

16. Greene J.D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends Cogn Sci, 11(8), 322–323; author reply 323–324. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004

17. Greene J.D., Morelli S.A., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L.E., & Cohen J.D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144–1154. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.004

18. Greene J.D., Nystrom L.E., Engell A.D., Darley J.M., & Cohen J.D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389–400. doi:S0896627304006348 [pii]10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027

19. Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M., & Cohen J.D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. doi:10.1126/science.1062872

20. Harenski C.L., Antonenko O., Shane M.S., & Kiehl K.A. (2008). Gender differences in neural mechanisms underlying moral sensitivity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 3(4), 313–321. doi:10.1093/scan/nsn026

21. Koenigs M., Kruepke M., Zeier J., & Newman J.P. (2012). Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 7(6), 708–714. doi:10.1093/scan/nsr048

22. Medvedeva T.I., Enikolopov S.N., Vorontsova O.U., & Kazmina O.U.(2019). Gender differences in making moral decisions.Voprosy psikhologii, (1), 124–133. (in Russ.)

23. Medvedeva T.I., Enikolopova E.V., & Enikolopov S.N.(2013). Damasio’s Somatic Marker Hypothesis and Iowa Gambling Task (review). Psikhologicheskie Issledovaniya, 6(32), 10. (in Russ.)

24. Moore A.B., Clark B.A., & Kane M.J. (2008). Who shalt not kill? Individual differences in working memory capacity, executive control, and moral judgment. Psychol Sci, 19(6), 549–557. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02122.x

25. Moretto G., Ladavas E., Mattioli F., & di Pellegrino G. (2010). A psychophysiological investigation of moral judgment after ventromedial prefrontal damage. J Cogn Neurosci, 22(8), 1888–1899. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21367

26. Navarrete C.D., McDonald M.M., Mott M.L., & Asher B. (2012). Virtual morality: emotion and action in a simulated three-dimensional “trolley problem”. Emotion, 12(2), 364–370. doi:10.1037/a0025561

27. Odriozola-González P., Planchuelo-Gómez Á., Irurtia-Muñiz M.J., & de Luis-García R. (2020). Psychological symptoms of the outbreak of the COVID-19 crisis and confinement in the population of Spain. 

28. Pancani L., Marinucci M., Aureli N., & Riva P. (2020). Forced social isolation and mental health: A study on 1006 Italians under COVID-19 quarantine. 

29. Petrinovich L., & O'Neill P. (1996). Influence of wording and framing effects on moral intuitions. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(3), 145–171. 

30. Romero-Rivas C., & Rodríguez-Cuadrado S. (2020). Moral decision-making and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. doi:10.31234/osf.io/8whkg

31. Starcke K., & Brand M. (2012). Decision making under stress: a selective review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 36(4), 1228–1248. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.003

32. Tarabrina N.V. (2001). Workshop on the psychology of post-traumatic stress. SPb.: Piter.(in Russ.)

33. Wang C., Pan R., Wan X., Tan Y., Xu L., Ho C.S., & Ho R.C. (2020). Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(5). doi:10.3390/ijerph17051729

34. Youssef F.F., Dookeeram K., Basdeo V., Francis E., Doman M., Mamed D., … Legall G. (2012). Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(4), 491–498. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.07.017