Malevolent Creativity and Personal Features of Young People in Different Socio-Political Conditions: Relationship and Interaction

Background. The relevance of the study is associated with the activation of malevolent creativity at the macro level in the form of information wars and isolation of Russia, which create threatening socio-political conditions, against the background of the special military operation in Ukraine.

Objectives. Objective of the study was to find out whether there are differences at the micro-level in different socio-political conditions in malevolent creativity as well as to identify its connections with personal characteristics: hostility, the trait of “Agreeableness”, and moral identity. The following hypotheses were formulated: 1. The level of antisocial creativity varies in different contexts and will be higher in threatening socio-political conditions and 2. the relationship between such personal characteristics as hostility, Agreeableness, moral identity, and malevolent creativity will be different in different socio-political conditions.

Study Participants. The study is a cross-sectional one. The first stage was carried out in 2019 with the participation of 81 young students from one of Moscow universities (mean age 19.2, SD = 1.2). 152 young students of the same Moscow university took part at the second stage in 2023 (mean age 19.1, SD = 1.29).

Methods. Participants filled out forms with the questionnaires “NEO-FFI” (a shortened version of the questionnaire “NEO PI-R”), BRAQ-24, moral identity questionnaire, “Behavioral features of antisocial creativity”.

Results. It is shown that there are differences in variables at the microsystem level in different sociopolitical conditions: MC and hostility are significantly lower, and moral identity and cooperation are significantly higher in the sample of 2023. The predictors of MC in the sample of 2023 were the traits of Agreeableness and hostility. In the sample of 2019, the trait of Agreeableness alone predicted MC. Differences in the strength of the relationship between the variables were revealed: in the sample of 2023, the relationship of hostility with antisocial creativity and the trait of Cooperation was significantly stronger than in the sample of 2019.

Conclusions. In threatening socio-political conditions, young people with high hostility and low level on the “Agreeableness” trait fall into the risk group, due to the high probability of the realization of creativity in behavior that harms other people, while realization of MC in behavior may be restrained through actualizing moral identity. In a calm and peaceful period, moral identity and hostility are less relevant for the implementation of MC in harmful behavior, since the development of “Agreeableness” is important in this case.

References

Aquino, K. F., Reed, A. (2002). The Self-importance of Moral Identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.

Baas, M., Roskes, M., Koch, S., Cheng, Yu., De Dreu, C. (2019). Why Social Threat Motivates Malevolent Creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(11), 1590–1602. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616721983855

Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802059424

De Dreu, C. K. W., Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Mental set and creative thought in social conflict: Threat rigidity versus motivated focus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (95), 648–661.

Dikaya, L. A. (2010). The reverse side of creativity. The role of creativity in countering terrorism. Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal (Russian Psychological Journal), 7(5–6), 57–62. (In Russ.).

Glaveanu, V. P., Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G., Hennessey, B., Kaufman, J. C., Lebuda, I., Lubart, T., Montuori, A., Ness, I. J., Plucker, J., Reiter-Palmon, R., Sierra, Z., Simonton, D. K., Neves-Pereira, M., Sternberg, R. J. (2019). Advancing Creativity Theory and Research: A Socio-cultural Manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395

Glaveanu, V. P. (2020). A sociocultural theory of creativity: Bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Review of General Psychology, 24(4), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/1089268020961763

Enikolopov, S. N., Tsybulsky, N. P. (2007). Psychometric analysis of the Russian version of the questionnaire for the diagnosis of aggression by A. Bass and M. Perry. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal (Psychological Journal), (1), 115–124. (In Russ.).

Enikolopov, S. N., Bochkova, M. N., Meshkova, N. V., Meshkov, I. A. (2023). Adaptation of the Moral Identity Questionnaire on the Russian Sample. Psikhologopedagogicheskie issledovaniya (Psychological-Educational Studies), 15(3), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.17759/psyedu.2023150308 (In Russ.).

Hao, N., Tang, M., Yang, J., Wang, Q., Runco, M. (2016). A New Tool to Measure Malevolent Creativity: The Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale. Frontiers in Psychology, (7), 682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00682

Kapoor, H., Khan, A. (2019). Creativity in Context: Presses and Task Effects in Negative Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 13(3), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000183

Meshkova, N. V. (2023). Social Creativity and Context: Perspectives of Research. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya (Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology), 12(1), 100–108. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2023120111 (In Russ.).

Meshkova, N. V., Enikolopov, S. N., Kudryavtsev, V. T., Kravtsov, O. G., Bochkova M. N., Meshkov I. A. (2020). Age and Gender Characteristics of Personality Predictors for Antisocial Creativity. Psikhologiya. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki (Psychology. High Economic School Journal), 17(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/10.17323/1813-8918-2020-1-60-72 (In Russ.).

Meshkova, N. V., Enikolopov, S. N., Mitina, O. V., Meshkov, I. A. (2018). Adaptation of the Malevolent Creativity Behavior Scale. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie (Psychological Science and Education), 23(6), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.17759/ pse.2018230603 (In Russ.).

Meshkova, N. V., Enikolopov, S. N., Zharinova, Ju. I., Mukovnina, D. D. (2022a). On the Relationship of Types of Social Creativity with Moral Identity and Tolerance. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 45(4), 159–178. https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2022.04.07 (In Russ.).

Meshkova, N. V., Kudryavtsev, V. T., Enikolopov, S. N. (2022b). To the Psychological Portrait of the Victims of Telephone Fraud. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 45(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.11621/vsp.2022.01.06 (In Russ.).

Orel, V. E., Senin, I. G. (2004). Questionnaire NEO PI-R. Yaroslavl: Publ. «Psychodiagnostics». (In Russ.).

Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Papousek, I., Rominger, C., Fink, A. (2021). Creativity in an Affective Context. European Psychologist, 27(3), 216–226. https://doi. org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000448

Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Fink, A., Rominger, C., Papousek, I. (2022a). Social exclusion increases antisocial tendencies: Evidence from retaliatory ideation in a malevolent creativity task. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000500

Perchtold-Stefan, C. M., Rominger, C., Papousek, I., Fink, A. (2022b). Women and men have a similar potential for malevolent creativity — But their underlying brain mechanisms are different. Brain Research, (1801), 148201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. brainres.2022.148201

Sternberg, R. J., Karami, S. (2022). An 8P theoretical framework for understanding creativity and theories of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 55–78. https:// doi.org/10.1002/jocb.516

Tromp, C., Sternberg, R. (2022). Dynamic Creativity: A Person × Task × Situation Interaction Framework. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(4), 553–565. https://doi. org/10.1002/jocb.551

Zhao, J., Xu, X., Pang, W. (2022). When do creative people engage in malevolent behaviors? The moderating role of moral reasoning. Personality and Individual Differences, 186, Part B, 111386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111386