Bibliometric Research on the “Us — Them” Concept in Psychology: Scoping Review
Background. The “Us — Them” concept is a fundamental element of social perception and intergroup interaction. Despite a long history of research on this phenomenon, psychological science maintains an active interest in this topic due to globalization, migration, the development of digital technologies, and the transformation of social structures in the contemporary world.
Objective. The goal is to conduct a bibliometric mapping of the publication landscape concerning the “Us — Them” dichotomy in psychological research from 2000 to 2025, analyzing its publication dynamics, conceptual structure, and key thematic areas.
Methods. Systematic retrieval and thematic synthesis without quality appraisal were applied. The study was carried out within the framework of a review and analytical approach, employing bibliometric mapping methods. The analysis of the Russian-language segment was conducted using the eLibrary.ru platform (N = 607 articles classified under “Psychology”). The English-language segment was analyzed using the Lens.org meta-platform with a multi-level semantic query incorporating disciplinary, procedural, and phenomenological layers (N = 4,424 articles post-filtering). Data visualization and cluster analysis were performed using VOSviewer software.
Results. A steady increase in publication activity was identified in both scientific segments, with a peak during 2020–2024. The findings indicate that English-language research tends toward interdisciplinarity at the intersection of psychology with neuroscience and medicine, whereas Russian-language research is more closely linked with linguistics, pedagogy, and cultural studies. Cluster analysis of keywords revealed four general research directions: 1) social identity and intergroup relations; 2) health psychology and clinical aspects; 3) cognitive and neurobiological mechanisms; and 4) digital identity and interaction in virtual environments. The analysis also noted weak trans-collaborative connectivity among research groups and a parallel development of Russian language and English language conceptual traditions.
Conclusions. The authors conclude that there is a strong positive trend in publication productivity, with dominant research areas in the studies of the “Us — Them” concept including social psychology, clinical psychology, sociology, and philosophy. A notable expansion is observed in the conceptual and categorical framework (and consequently the research problematics) towards interdisciplinary connections and the advancement of information technologies.
References
Ageev, V.S. (1990). Intergroup interaction: socio-psychological problems. Moscow: Moscow University Press. (In Russ.)
Bauer, E.A., Kabardov, M.K. (2011). Psychology of prejudice in the context of intercultural education. Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya = Cultural-Historical Psychology, 7(3), 90–97. (In Russ.). URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/chp/archive/2011_n3/47991 (accessed: 30.03.2026).
Bollen, K.A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135234
Chang, M., Krüssel, S., Parajuli, L.K., Kim, J., Lee, D., Merodio, A., Kwon, J., Okabe, S., Kwon, H.B. (2025). Intercellular communication in the brain through a dendritic nanotubular network. Science, 390, eadr7403. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adr7403
Choi, J., Lee, Y.B., So, D., Kim, J.Y., Choi, S., Kim, S., Keum, S. (2025). Cortical representations of affective pain shape empathic fear in male mice. Nature Communications, 16(1), 2366. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57230-w
Cikara, M., Van Bavel, J.J. (2024). The neuroscience of intergroup dynamics. Annual Review of Psychology, 75, 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-032323-012345
Cruwys, T., Haslam, C., Rathbone, J.A., Williams, E. (2025). Social identity and health: Mapping a decade of growth. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 17(1), e12567. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12567
Diemer, J., Alpers, G.W., Peperkorn, H.M., Shiban, Y., Mühlberger, A. (2015). The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 26. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026
Emel’yanova, T.P., Nestik, T.A. (2025). Social psychology of global risks. In: A.L. Zhuravlev, (ed.). Contemporary social psychology: Results and prospects. (pp. 85–112). Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russ.)
Gulevich, O.A. (2023). Psychology of intergroup relations: textbook for universities (2nd ed.). Moscow: Yurait Publ. (In Russ.)
Haslam, S.A., Jetten, J., Postmes, T., Haslam, C. (2009). Social identity, health and well-being: An emerging agenda for applied psychology. Applied Psychology, 58(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00379.x
Jost, J.T., Banaji, M.R., Nosek, B.A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
Kwon, O., Wen, Y. (2010). An empirical study of the factors affecting social network service use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.04.011
Lebedeva, N.M., Tatarko, A.N. (2003). Socio-psychological factors of ethnic tolerance and strategies of intergroup interaction in multicultural regions of Russia. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 24(5), 31–44. (In Russ.)
Mackie, D.M., Devos, T., Smith, E.R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.602
Manstead, A.S.R. (2018). The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(2), 267–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
Martsinovskaya, T.D. (2023). Psychology of identity. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russ.)
McLaughlin, K.A., Sheridan, M.A., Lambert, H.K. (2014). Childhood adversity and neural development: Deprivation and threat as distinct dimensions of early experience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 578–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.012
Molenberghs, P., Prochilo, G., Louis, W.R. (2023). The neural basis of intergroup relations: A meta-analytic review. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 18(1), nsad012. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad012
Nestik, T.A., Zhuravlev, A.L. (2018). Attitude to global risks: socio-psychological analysis. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 39(1), 24–34. (In Russ.)
Popova, R.R., Bayanova, L.F., Veraksa, A.N., Kochetkova, E.A. (2018). Psychological features of emotion recognition in preschoolers with different levels of cultural congruence. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya = Psychological Studies, 11(61). (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54359/ps.v11i61.265
Prusakova, O.A., Sergienko, E.A. (2006). Understanding emotions in preschool children. Voprosy psikhologii, (4), 24–33. (In Russ.)
Rosenfield, D., Meuret, A.E., Chmielewski, M., Steele, A.M., Smits, J.A.J. (2016). The desire to belong: Social identification as a predictor of treatment outcome in social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 81, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.03.008
Saarinen, A., Jääskeläinen, I.P., Harjunen, V., Keltikangas-Järvinen, L., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Ravaja, N. (2021). Neural basis of in-group bias and prejudices: A systematic meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 131, 1214–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.10.027
Shikhirev, P.N. (1999). Contemporary social psychology. Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russ.)
Sobkin, V.S., Fedotova, A.V. (2018). Teenager in social networks: on the issue of socio-psychological well-being. National Psychological Journal, (4), 23–36. (In Russ.)
Soldatova, G.U. (2006). Psychological mechanisms of xenophobia. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 27(2), 5–18. (In Russ.)
Soldatova, G.U., Rasskazova, E.I. (2024). Digital socialization and identity formation in the online space: new challenges and opportunities. Voprosy psikhologii, (1), 3–15. (In Russ.)
Sozinova, I.M., Znamenskaya, I.I., Alexandrov, Yu.I. (2013). Moral attitude toward the “stranger” in children 3–11 years old, solving moral dilemmas: prejudices and preferences. Teoreticheskaya i eksperimental’naya psikhologiya = Theoretical and Experimental Psychology, 6(4), 44–57. (In Russ.)
Stets, J.E., Burke, P.J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695870
Sukhorukov, I.S. (2021a). Information environment in the system of factors forming ethnocultural identity of adolescents. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Scientific Notes. Electronic Scientific Journal of Kursk State University, (4), 322–334. (In Russ.)
Sukhorukov, I.S. (2021b). Ethnocultural identity and differentiation of “Us” and “Them” among adolescents: features of ethnic socialization of adolescents in the context of cultural globalization. Bereginya. 777. Sova: Obshchestvo. Politika. Ekonomika = Bereginya. 777. Owl: Society. Politics. Economics, (4), 193–210. (In Russ.)
Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: W.G. Austin, S. Worchel, (eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations. (pp. 33–47). Boston: Brooks/Cole Publ.
Tarasov, E.F. (2014). Categorization as a way of understanding the world. In: N.D. Pavlova, I.A. Zachesova, (eds.). Problems of discourse psychology. (pp. 56–71). Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russ.)
Tylka, T.L., Wood-Barcalow, N. (2015). What is and what is not positive body image? Conceptual foundations and construct definition. Body Image, 14, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2015.04.001
Zinchenko, Yu.P., Shaigerova, L.A., Shilko, R.S. (2017). Subjective well-being as a basis for social stability in a society of high cultural diversity. In: A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Koltsova, (eds.). Fundamental and applied research in modern psychology: results and prospects. (pp. 1958–1966). Moscow: Institute of Psychology RAS Press. (In Russ.)
Zhuravlev, A.L., Nestik, T.A. (2019). Socio-psychological consequences of new technologies introduction: promising research directions. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 40(5), 35–47. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S020595920006074-7
Zhuravlev, I.V., Tkhostov, A.Sh. (2003). Subjectivity as a boundary: topological and genetic models. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal = Psychological Journal, 24(3), 5–12. (In Russ.)
Recieved: 09/30/2025
Accepted: 05/16/2026
Published: 05/31/2026
Keywords: “Us — Them” concept; ingroup; outgroup; bibliometric mapping; social identity; conceptual clusters; VOSviewer; psychology of intergroup relations
Available online since: 31.05.2026
Surkova, E.G., Nikishina, V.B. (2026). Bibliometric Research on the “Us — Them” Concept in Psychology: Scoping Review. Lomonosov Psychology Journal, 49(3), .
copied

This work is licensed under a Сreative Commons Atribiution - NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)







