Lomonosov Psychology Journal
ISSN 0137-0936 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9852 (Online)
En Ru
ISSN 0137-0936 (Print)
ISSN 2309-9852 (Online)

Reading comprehension of educational texts among 4–8 grades students as indicator of their ability to learn

Introduction. Within the framework of the actual problem of the ability to learn for a modern school the peculiarities of children's reading comprehension of edu-cational texts were studied. The analysis showed that the problem of reading com-prehension is not sufficiently developed from the standpoint of Cultural Activity Approach, since in existing studies (I.I. Ilyasov, I.V. Usacheva, O.E., Malskaya, etc.), the activity aspect is expressed only in a detailed description of the actions that provide reading comprehension and their structure, but these works do not “grasp” the general meaning of these actions related to the students' understanding of the indicative purpose of educational texts — that it is from their content that the indicative basis of the subject actions performed should be ex-tracted. The most clearly indicative purpose of a special type of educational text — the definition of a concept — is justified in studies of the formation of the recogni-tion action (RA) (P.Ya. Galperin, N.F. Talyzina, L.F. Obukhova, etc.), where the “understanding” of the definition is the ability to recognize the objects that are described by it. The goal: to study the ability of students to perceive educational texts (ordinary educational texts and definitions of concepts) as tools for completing of specific tasks. Methods and sample. A sample of students in grades 4–8 (N = 280) was conducted: 1) assessment of the formation of the ability to work with definitions of concepts (concept’ recognition tasks, developed on the basis of the principles of diagnostics by N.F. Talyzina), 2) assessment of the ability to highlight the main thing in the text (the method of O.E. Malskaya and A.A. Sidelnikova “Selection of main sentences” for grades 4–8), 3) assessment of the ability to structure the text (the task of selecting paragraphs and their heading), 4) two GIT subtests (“Execution of rules” and “Numerical series”). Results and conclusions. It was shown that the understanding of definitions significantly and positively correlates with the understanding of educational texts. It was also revealed that the level of formation of both the ability to work with definitions and the ability to work with texts does not significantly increase after the 4th grade and up to the 8th grade there is a “failure” in these parameters, despite the smooth positive dynamics in some intellectual abilities.

Acknowledgements:

The study was supported by the RFBR grant No. 19-013-00717 “Orientation to a given knowledge as an indicator of the ability to learn from schoolchildren” 

References

Ajdarova, L.I. (1968). Formation of some grammar concepts according to the third type of orientation in the word. In P.Ya. Galperin, N.F. Talyzina (Eds.), The dependence of learning on the type of orientation. (pp. 42–80). Moscow: MSU publ. (in Russ.).

Asmolov, A.G. (2010). Formation of universal educational actions in primary school: from action to thought. Moscow: Prosveshhenie. (in Russ.).

Brown, P. C., Roediger, III H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014) Make it stick. Harvard University Press.

Burlachuk, L.F., Morozov, S.M. (1989). Dictionary-reference book on psychodiagnostics. Kiev: Naukova dumka publ. (in Russ.).

Chudinova, E.V., Zajceva, V.E. (2014). Educational modeling and text comprehension. Kul'turno-istoricheskaja psihologija (Cultural-historical psychology), 1, 44–53. (in Russ.).

Davydov V.V. (2002). Types of generalization in learning. Moscow: PIRAO publ. (in Russ.).

Freebody, P., Luke, A. (1990). “Literacies” programs: debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect, 5, 7–16.

Fridman L.M., Kulagina I.Ju. (1993). Formation of general educational skills among schoolchildren. Kemerovo. (in Russ.).

Gal'perin, P.Ja. (1966). Psychology of thinking and the doctrine of the gradual formation of mental actions. Studies of Thinking in Soviet Psychology (pp. 236–277). Moscow: Nauka. (in Russ.).

Gal'perin, P.Ja. (1985). Teaching methods and mental development of the child. Moscow: MSU publ. (in Russ.).

Gal'perin, P.Ja. (2002). Lectures on psychology. Moscow: MPSI publ. (in Russ.).

Gal'perin, P.Ja., Talyzina, N.F. (1957). Formation of initial geometric concepts based on the organizational action of students. Voprosy psihologii (Issues of psychology), 1, 28–44. (in Russ.).

Glaser, R. (1988). Cognitive science and education. International Social Science Journal: Cognitive Science, 40 (1), 21–44.

Hautamäki, J. et al. (2002). Assessing learning-to-learn: A framework.

Il'jasov, I.I., Galatenko, N.A. (1988). Independent work with the book. Moscow: MSU publ. (in Russ.).

Key competences for lifelong learning: European Reference Framework (2007). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/285153.

King, A. (1994). Autonomy and question asking: The role of personal control in guided student-generated questioning. Learning and Individual Differences, 6 (2), 163–185. DOI:10.1016/1041-6080(94)90008-6

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Korotaeva, I.V. (2000). Ispol'zovanie priema sistematizacii teksta u starsheklassnikov i studentov: Diss. ...kand. psychol. nauk (The use of the method of systematization of the text in high school students and students). PhD (Psychology). M., MGU. (in Russ.).

Mal'skaja, O.E. (1981). Analiz struktury i formirovanija dejatel'nosti uchenija: Diss. ...kand. psychol. nauk (Analysis of the structure and formation of the learning activity). PhD (Psychology). M., MGU. (in Russ.).

Mullis, I. V.S., Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M., Trong, K.L., Sainsbury M. (2009). PIRLS 2011. Assessment Framework. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.

OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD. DOI:10.1787/9789264062658-en

Olejnikova, E.V. (2012). Vlijanie podhoda k ucheniju na ponimanie uchebnyh tekstov: Diss. ...kand. psychol. nauk (The influence of the approach to teaching on the understanding of educational texts). PhD (Psychology). M., MGU. (in Russ.).

Podol'skij, A.I. (1987). The formation of cognitive action. Scientific abstraction and reality. M.: MGU publ. (in Russ.).

Posner, G.J. et al. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211–227. DOI:10.1002/sce.3730660207.

Sidel'nikova, A.A. (1984). Features of awareness of educational activity: Thesis. M., MGU. (in Russ.).

Sidneva, A.N. (2010). Sravnitel'nyj analiz podhodov k soderzhaniju i formirovaniju umenija uchit'sja: Diss. ...kand. psychol. nauk (Comparative analysis of approaches to the content and formation of the ability to learn). PhD (Psychology). Moscow, MGU. (in Russ.).

Sidneva, A.N., Vysotskaya, E.V., Korotaeva, I.V., Mozharovsky, I.L., Shinelis, V.A. (2020). How Do Primary Schoolchildren Use Concept Definitions in Recognition Tasks? Orientation Towards Given Knowledge in Two Different Educational Systems. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 13 (2), 29–64. DOI:10.11621/pir.2020.0203

Snow, C.E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica: Rand Corp. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465.html.

Talyzina, N.F. (1957). On the question of mastering the initial geometric concepts. Proceedings of the meeting on psychology (July 1955). Moscow: APN RSFSR Publ. (in Russ.).

Talyzina, N.F. (2001). Educational psychology. Moscow: Akademia. (in Russ.).

Talyzina, N.F. (2018). Activity theory of learning. M.: MGU publ. (in Russ.).

The Federal State Educational Standard (FSES) of primary general education (2009). (in Russ.). https://kpfu.ru/docs/F2009061155/FGOS.NOO_23_10_09_Minjust_3._1_.pdf.

Usacheva, I.V. (1990). Independent work of students with a book. Educational and methodological manual. Moscow: MGU publ. (in Russ.).

Vysotskaja, E.V., Lobanova, A.D., Janishevskaja, M.A., Hrebtova, S.B. (2020). Introduction to the natural sciences: a view from the cultural history of mankind. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie (Psychological Science and Education). 25, 5, 95–108. (in Russ.). DOI:10.17759/pse.2020250508

Woolley, G. (2011). Reading Comprehension: Assisting Children with Learning Difficulties. Springer Netherlands. DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-1174-7_1

Zukerman, G.A., Ermakova, I.V. (2003). Developmental effects of the system of D.B. Elkonin — V.V. Davydov. Psihologicheskaja nauka i obrazovanie (Psychological science and education), 8 (4), 56–73. (in Russ.). DOI:10.17323/1814-9545-2011-2-123-150

Zukerman, G.A., Kovaleva, G.S., Kuznecova M.I. (2011). Victory in PIRLS and defeat in PISA: the fate of reading literacy of 10–15-year-old schoolchildren. Voprosy obrazovanija (Education issues), 2, 123–151. (in Russ.).

Recieved: 05/12/2021

Accepted: 06/15/2021

Published: 09/15/2021

Keywords: learning to learn; learning activity; reading comprehension; recognition action; Activity Approach

Available online since: 15.09.2021

Issue 3, 2021