Lomonosov Psychology Journal
ISSN 0137-0936
eISSN 2309-9852
En Ru
ISSN 0137-0936
eISSN 2309-9852

Individual characteristic aspects of psychological culture of students of distance and full-time form of learning

Relevance of the work is determined by the need to study the personality and psychological characteristics of students choosing full-time and distance learning to understand the general laws of the formation of the psychological culture of a graduate in the context of the active development of electronic educational space. 

The purpose of the study is to compare the individual characterological elements of the psychological culture of students choosing full-time and distance learning in the development of engineering specialties. 

Methods and sampling. The sample consisted of 84 respondents aged 18 to 22 years studying in the field of information technology. They were divided into two groups depending on the preferred form of education: distance learning (40 students) and full-time (44 students). The following tools were used: five-factor personality questionnaire by H. Tsuyi in the adaptation of A.B. Khromov; B. Bass technique for diagnosing the personality orientation, Yu.M. Orlov technique for identifying communication needs; viability test by S. Muddy; self-attitude test questionnaire (CCA) by V.V. Stolin and S.R. Pantileeva. 

Results. Distinctions in the reflexive-evaluative component, communicative features are highlighted. Students of distance learning have a lower level of the need for communication, lower levels of self-regulation and a more pronounced psychological distance in communication, associated with lower rates of self-acceptance, compared with full-time students. The choice of the method of organizing interpersonal interaction in the educational situation is affected by the psychological distance of the person in communication. In case of distance-learning students, the factor of “attachment-remoteness” appeared to be more significant compared to full-time students, who were characterized by a higher indicator of the need for other people to evaluate them. 

Conclusions. The active development of e-education requires to take into account the specifics of the personal characteristics of students and should not be limited only to the expansion of user competencies. This is determined by the distinguished differences in the characteristics of self-acceptance, the severity of the need for communication, as well as the psychological distance of the person in communication between students who prefer distance or full-time educational formats. 

References

Bacharina O.V., Godlevskaya E.V. (2018). Man’s media culture: essence, components and formation levels. Sovremennaya vysshaya shkola: innovatsionnyy aspect (Modern higher school: an innovative aspect), 2, 34–41. (in Russ.).

Badanova N.M., Purynycheva G.M. (2017). Understanding the phenomenon of information culture. (in Russ.).

Balashova Yu.V. (2011). Kognitivnyye i lichnostnyye osobennosti studentov ochnogo i distantsionnogo obucheniya. Diss. ... kand. psychol. nauk. (Cognitive and personality characteristics of full-time and distance learning students). Ph.D. (Psychology). Moscow. (in Russ.).

Chebotareva N.I. (2013). Pedagogicheskiye usloviya formirovaniya mediakompetentnosti studentov vuza. Diss. ... kand. ped. nauk. (Pedagogical conditions for the formation of media competence of university students). Ph.D. (Psychology). Moscow. (in Russ.).

Dementieva E.V. (2011). The psychological culture of man: the current state of the problem, Vestnik Mordovskogo universiteta (Bulletin of the Mordovian University), 2, 12–17. (in Russ.).

Gluhanyuk N.S. Praktikum po psihodiagnostike: ucheb. posobie 2-e izd., pererub. i dop. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo psihologo-social'nogo instituta, 2005. 216 s. (in Russ.).

Grigor'yeva I.V. (2013). Informatsionno-obrazovatel'noye prostranstvo vuza kak faktor formirovaniya mediakompetentnosti budushchego pedagoga Diss. ... kand. ped. nauk. (The information and educational space of the university as a factor in the formation of media competence of the future teacher). Ph.D. (Psychology). Irkutsk. (in Russ.).

Hromov A.B. Pyatifaktornyj oprosnik lichnosti: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Kurgan: Izd-vo Kurganskogo gos. universiteta, 2000. 23 s. (in Russ.).

Il'in E.P. Psihologiya obshcheniya i mezhlichnostnyh otnoshenij. SPb.: Piter, 2009. 576 s. (in Russ.).

Karelin A. Bol'shaya enciklopediya psihologicheskih testov. M.: Eksmo, 2007. 416 s. (in Russ.).

Kolmogorova L.S. (1999). The formation of the psychological culture of the student, Voprosy psikhologii. (Psychology Issues), 1, 83–91. (in Russ.).

Kolominsky Y.L., Strelkova O.V. (2013). The psychological culture of childhood. Minsk: Higher School. (in Russ.).

Kuz'mina M.V. (2014). Formirovaniye mediakul'tury uchashchikhsya v protsesse sozdaniya imi obrazovatel'nykh videomaterialov. Diss. ... kand. ped. nauk. (The formation of media culture of students in the process of creating educational video materials). Ph.D. (Psychology). Moscow. (in Russ.).

Leont'ev D.A., Rasskazova E.I. Test zhiznestojkosti. M.: Smysl, 2006. 63 s. (in Russ.).

Motkov O.I. (2008). Personality and psyche: essence, structure and development. Samara: Bahrah-M. (in Russ.).

Obozov N.N. (1995). The psychological culture of relationships. St. Petersburg: Peter. (in Russ.).

Pevzner N.Yu. (2007). Psikhologicheskaya kul'tura pedagoga i effektivnost' professional'noy deyatel'nosti. Diss. ... kand. psychol. nauk. (The psychological culture of the teacher and the effectiveness of professional activity). Ph.D. (Psychology). Moscow. (in Russ.).

Puzikova O.V. (2003). Psikhologicheskaya kul'tura kak faktor samorealizatsii lichnosti (na primere lichnosti uchitelya). Diss. ... kand. psychol. nauk. (Psychological culture as a factor in the self-realization of a person (on the example of a teacher’s personality). Ph.D. (Psychology). Khabarovsk. (in Russ.).

Romanov Ye.V., Drozdova T.V. (2017). Distance learning: necessary and sufficient conditions for effective implementation. Sovremennoye obrazovaniye (Modern Education), 1, 172–198. (in Russ.). 

Sessarevskaya Z.A. (2018). A comparative analysis of the psychological culture of the personality of workers employed in various fields of professional activity, Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika (Psychology and Psychotechnics), 1, 83–90. (in Russ.).

Uddin Md.A. (2013). Individual differences of students studying in distance (a foreign literature review. Sovremennaia zarubezhnaia psikhologiia (Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology), 3, 104–121. (In Russ.).

Uddin Md.A. (2014). Sravnitel'nyy analiz lichnostnykh i motivatsionnykh osobennostey studentov ochnogo i distantsionnogo obucheniya: na primere studentov-psikhologov. Diss. ... kand. psychol. nauk. (Comparative analysis of personal and motivational characteristics of full-time and distance learning students: the example of psychology students). Ph.D. (Psychology). Moscow. (in Russ.).

Recieved: 06/01/2020

Accepted: 08/23/2020

Published: 12/07/2020

Keywords: distance learning; digitalization of education; psychological culture; individual and characterological aspects; the need for communication; self-acceptance

Available online since: 05.12.2020

Issue 4, 2020